Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Aug 4, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 4, 2023 - Sep 14, 2023
Date Accepted: Nov 22, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Engaging Cancer Care Physicians in Off-Label Drug Clinical Trials: Human-Centered Design Approach

Parsell MC, Greenleaf MN, Kombara GG, Sukhatme VP, Lam WA

Engaging Cancer Care Physicians in Off-Label Drug Clinical Trials: Human-Centered Design Approach

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e51604

DOI: 10.2196/51604

PMID: 38358789

PMCID: 10905356

Engaging Cancer Care Physicians in Off Label Drug Clinical Trials: A Human-Centered Design Approach

  • Maren C. Parsell; 
  • Morgan N. Greenleaf; 
  • Greeshma G. Kombara; 
  • Vikas P. Sukhatme; 
  • Wilbur A. Lam

ABSTRACT

Background:

Utilizing a human-centered design (HCD) approach and methods can provide clinical trial design teams with a better understanding of the needs, preferences, and attitudes of clinical trial stakeholders. It can also be used to understand the challenges and barriers physician stakeholders face in initiating and completing clinical trials, especially for off label drugs (OLD) to treat unmet clinical needs in cancer treatment. However, the HCD approach and methods are not commonly taught in the context of clinical trial design and few step-by-step guides like this study are available to demonstrate its application.

Objective:

The aim of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility and process of applying a human-centered design approach to creating clinical trial support resources for physician stakeholders to overcome barriers to pursing clinical trials for off label drugs to treat cancer.

Methods:

A human-centered design approach was used to develop OLD clinical trial support concepts. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 physicians to identify barriers to prescribing OLDs for cancer treatments (outside of a clinical trial and absent national guidelines) and initiating cancer clinical trials for OLDs. Affinity mapping and thematic analysis of qualitative data gathered from the interviews informed further co-design exercises with 9 participants in 3 sessions. These in-person sessions included creative matrix exercises and concept voting to refine and prioritize the ideas that the design team used to produce 3 recommended concepts.

Results:

Findings demonstrate the potential of HCD methods to uncover important insights into barriers physicians face in prescribing OLDs and initiating and completing OLD clinical trials such as recruitment, financial disincentives, and stigma. Participants found the HCD approach engaging and 60% participated for the duration of the study despite their full clinical schedules. Over 150 ideas were generated in 3 co-design sessions, with the groups voting on 15 priority ideas which the design team then refined into 3 final recommendations.

Conclusions:

Using participatory human-centered design methods, we delivered 3 concepts for clinical trial support resources to help physician stakeholders overcome barriers to pursing clinical trials for off label drugs to treat cancer. This paper highlights the process, methods, and potential of human-centered design to improve cancer clinical trial design. Future work is needed to train clinical trial designers in the HCD approach and methods, and to encourage adoption in the field.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Parsell MC, Greenleaf MN, Kombara GG, Sukhatme VP, Lam WA

Engaging Cancer Care Physicians in Off-Label Drug Clinical Trials: Human-Centered Design Approach

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e51604

DOI: 10.2196/51604

PMID: 38358789

PMCID: 10905356

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.