Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jul 13, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 13, 2023 - Sep 7, 2023
Date Accepted: Dec 19, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Medical Students’ Perceptions on Identifying and Addressing Emotional Responses in Emergency Medicine: Pilot Investigation

Agarwal A, Gonzales R, Munden C, Albright D, Tsao S

Medical Students’ Perceptions on Identifying and Addressing Emotional Responses in Emergency Medicine: Pilot Investigation

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e50827

DOI: 10.2196/50827

PMID: 38198202

PMCID: 10809065

Medical Student Perceptions on Identifying and Addressing their Emotional Responses in Emergency Medicine: A Pilot Investigation

  • Anish Agarwal; 
  • Rachel Gonzales; 
  • Cory Munden; 
  • DaCarla Albright; 
  • Suzana Tsao

ABSTRACT

Background:

Training in acute care fields, such as emergency medicine (EM) where exposure to critically ill or injured patients is high may impact the emotional well-being of trainees and contribute to burnout or mental health symptoms. Investigating how, and if, trainees prepare for these situations is necessary to ensure they are adequately supported and to promote well-being.

Objective:

To evaluate medical student perspectives and preparedness of handing acute care and trauma emotionally.

Methods:

We conducted a remote digital survey of medical students during their EM clerkship at a large, urban academic institution. The primary outcome of interest was student-reported preparedness and comfort in handling trauma and critical care patient encounters. Secondary outcomes included awareness of well-being resources and comfort in accessing well-being resources.

Results:

A total of 57 medical students completed the voluntary survey and half of students (n=28, 49.1%) reported having witnessed the care of a critically ill or a penetrating trauma patient (e.g., victim of gun-violence). A majority (n=40, 70.2%) had thought about how these events may impact them, and over half felt unprepared to identify the emotional impact these cases may have (n=31, 54.8%) or address this emotional or mental health impact (n=36, 63.2%). Less than a quarter, 24.6% (n=14), were aware of resources and 57.9% (n=33) did not feel fully comfortable connecting with resources if needed. Students who had previously witnessed critical care were more likely to feel well prepared in identifying the emotional impact (p=0.007) and in addressing this impact (p=0.001).

Conclusions:

In this cross-sectional survey, students did not feel fully prepared to identify or address the emotional impact of working in EM, nor are they aware of or comfortable with accessing institutional resources meant to support their well-being. These findings can help inform and guide interventions by educational and academic leaders to create and promote environments that empower students with tools to identify their own emotions and connect to well-being resources. Clinical Trial: n/a


 Citation

Please cite as:

Agarwal A, Gonzales R, Munden C, Albright D, Tsao S

Medical Students’ Perceptions on Identifying and Addressing Emotional Responses in Emergency Medicine: Pilot Investigation

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e50827

DOI: 10.2196/50827

PMID: 38198202

PMCID: 10809065

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.