Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jun 29, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 29, 2023 - Aug 24, 2023
Date Accepted: Nov 22, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

An Exploration of the Goodness of Fit of Web-Based Tools for Māori: Qualitative Study Using Interviews and Focus Groups

Donkin L, Bidios-Putt MC, Wilson H, Hayward P, Chan A

An Exploration of the Goodness of Fit of Web-Based Tools for Māori: Qualitative Study Using Interviews and Focus Groups

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e50385

DOI: 10.2196/50385

PMID: 38696236

PMCID: 11099811

Are online tools a good fit for Māori: a qualitative study using interviews and focus groups

  • Liesje Donkin; 
  • Marie-Claire Bidios-Putt; 
  • Holly Wilson; 
  • Penelope Hayward; 
  • Amy Chan

ABSTRACT

Background:

Indigenous communities often have poorer health outcomes and servicing by traditional models of care. Several barriers exist that decrease the likelihood of indigenous communities being able to receive equitable care, including access issues; cost; systemic racism; and a lack of culturally safe and responsive services. Web-based interventions (WBIs) have been shown to be effective for supporting mental health / well-being and can overcome some of the traditional barriers to help-seeking such as those experienced by indigenous communities. However, despite a large number of WBIs being developed, more is needed to know how well they fit with the indigenous worldview and how they meet the needs of indigenous communities.

Objective:

this study sought to understand the views of Māori about WBIs for health and wellbeing.

Methods:

This study used interviews and focus groups with 30 participants to explore the views of Māori (indigenous people of New Zealand) about WBIs. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results:

Key themes emerged indicating that WBIs were generally considered a poor fit for Māori. Specifically, the design of WBIs did not align with the Māori worldview or concepts of wellbeing which centres around people, relationships, spirituality and holistic views of wellbeing. In addition to this, ongoing mistrust in the motives of the creators of WBI also influenced willingness to use and trust a WBI.

Conclusions:

Whilst WBIs are often considered to be a way to reduce barriers to care, they may not meet the needs of Māori when used as a standalone intervention.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Donkin L, Bidios-Putt MC, Wilson H, Hayward P, Chan A

An Exploration of the Goodness of Fit of Web-Based Tools for Māori: Qualitative Study Using Interviews and Focus Groups

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e50385

DOI: 10.2196/50385

PMID: 38696236

PMCID: 11099811

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.