Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jun 19, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 19, 2023 - Aug 19, 2023
Date Accepted: Feb 7, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Adapting the Number of Questions Based on Detected Psychological Distress for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy With an Embodied Conversational Agent: Comparative Study

Shidara K, Tanaka H, Adachi H, Kanayama D, Kudo T, Nakamura S

Adapting the Number of Questions Based on Detected Psychological Distress for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy With an Embodied Conversational Agent: Comparative Study

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e50056

DOI: 10.2196/50056

PMID: 38483464

PMCID: 10979340

Adapting Number of Questions Based on Detected Psychological Distress for Cognitive Behavior Therapy with a Virtual Agent: Comparative Study

  • Kazuhiro Shidara; 
  • Hiroki Tanaka; 
  • Hiroyoshi Adachi; 
  • Daisuke Kanayama; 
  • Takashi Kudo; 
  • Satoshi Nakamura

ABSTRACT

Background:

The high prevalence of mental illness represents a serious societal crisis. One factor aggravating this crisis is the existence of barriers that limit access to mental health care services. To mitigate this problem, cognitive behavior therapy has been automated using virtual agents to extend the availability of such services. A pivotal process of cognitive behavior therapy is the correction of automatic thoughts. In this process, a therapist uses Socratic questioning to guide patients in exploring alternative perspectives and correcting their thoughts. The effectiveness of this process hinges on the therapist's ability to adapt the number and nature of questions based on the patient's changing mood and distress level. Superficial or inadequate correction of an automatic thought might reduce the therapy’s effectiveness. Since existing virtual agents lack this adaptive questioning capability, their effectiveness is limited. This situation raises the need for virtual agents that can automatically detect psychological distress and adapt question selection to an individual patient's psychological distress level.

Objective:

This study develops and evaluates a method that automatically adapts the number of Socratic questions based on the level of detected psychological distress during a cognitive behavior therapy session with a virtual agent. We hypothesize that this adaptive approach to question selection will lower psychological distress, reduce negative emotional states, and produce more substantial cognitive change compared to a random number of questions.

Methods:

In this study, which envisions healthcare support in daily life, we recruited participants from 18 to 65 for an experiment that involved two different conditions: 1) a virtual agent that asked a number of questions to prompt automatic thought correction based on psychological distress detection; or 2) a virtual agent that just asked a random number of questions. The participants were assigned to one of the two groups and experienced a single cognitive behavior therapy session with a virtual agent and completed questionnaires before and after

Results:

Participants completed the experiment. There were slight differences in sex, age, or pre-experiment psychological distress levels between the two groups. The adapted number of questions group showed a significantly greater reduction of psychological distress than the random number of questions group. We also found that there was a significant difference in cognitive change when the number of questions closely aligned with the model's estimate compared to when the number deviated from it.

Conclusions:

Adapting question selection based on the level of psychological distress improved the effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy provided by virtual agents.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Shidara K, Tanaka H, Adachi H, Kanayama D, Kudo T, Nakamura S

Adapting the Number of Questions Based on Detected Psychological Distress for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy With an Embodied Conversational Agent: Comparative Study

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e50056

DOI: 10.2196/50056

PMID: 38483464

PMCID: 10979340

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.