Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jun 15, 2023
Date Accepted: Feb 21, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Lessons From the Field From a Volunteer Telehealth Ambassador Program to Enhance Video Visits Among Low-Income Patients: Qualitative Improvement Study

Tuot D, Mukerjee A, Churape A, DeFries T, Su G, Khoong E, Lyles C

Lessons From the Field From a Volunteer Telehealth Ambassador Program to Enhance Video Visits Among Low-Income Patients: Qualitative Improvement Study

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e49993

DOI: 10.2196/49993

PMID: 38619874

PMCID: 11058553

A Volunteer Telehealth Ambassador Program to Enhance Video Visits Among Low-income Patients: Lessons from the Field

  • Delphine Tuot; 
  • Aarya Mukerjee; 
  • Amanda Churape; 
  • Triveni DeFries; 
  • George Su; 
  • Elaine Khoong; 
  • Courtney Lyles

ABSTRACT

Background:

Prevalence of telehealth video use across the United States is uneven, with low uptake in safety-net health care delivery systems, which care for patient populations who face barriers to use of digital technologies.

Objective:

To increase video visit use in an urban safety-net delivery system, we piloted a Telehealth Ambassador program in which volunteers provided technical support to patients to participate in video visits rather than audio-only visits.

Methods:

The RE-AIM framework was used for program evaluation. Reach was quantified by the percentage of eligible patients who answered calls from Telehealth Ambassadors. Program efficacy was calculated in several ways: (1) percentage of interested patients with video visit capability who were successfully onboarded; (2) percentage of onboarded patients who completed their scheduled video visits; and (3) percentage of patients reached who completed their scheduled video visit regardless of interest and capability. A structured telephone survey was used to ascertain barriers to completion of telehealth video visits.

Results:

Between March and May 2021, Telehealth Ambassadors attempted to contact 776 eligible patients; 43.6% (n=338/776) were reached by phone, among whom 44.4% (n=150/338) voiced interest in video-visits and were provided digital support. Mean call duration was 8.8 (range 0-35) minutes. Over 67.3% (n=101/150) of patients who received support successfully completed a telehealth video visit with their provider, which translated into a 30.0% video visit completion rate among eligible patients reached by phone (n=101/338) and 13.0% (n=101/776) among all eligible patients. Among patients who were contacted but declined video visit digital support, 42% did not see added value beyond a telehealth audio-only visit, 20% had insufficient internet access and 27% declined learning about a new technology.

Conclusions:

Increasing the program’s reach will require outreach solutions that do not rely solely on phone calls. Routinely highlighting the benefits of video visits and partnering with community-based organizations to overcome structural barriers to telehealth use will help increase the program’s efficacy.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tuot D, Mukerjee A, Churape A, DeFries T, Su G, Khoong E, Lyles C

Lessons From the Field From a Volunteer Telehealth Ambassador Program to Enhance Video Visits Among Low-Income Patients: Qualitative Improvement Study

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e49993

DOI: 10.2196/49993

PMID: 38619874

PMCID: 11058553

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.