Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Jun 9, 2023
Date Accepted: Jul 27, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparing the Acceptability and Quality of Intervention Modalities for Suicidality in the Emergency Department: Randomized Feasibility Trial

Larkin C, Tulu B, Djamasbi S, Garner R, Varzgani F, Siddique M, Pietro J, Boudreaux ED

Comparing the Acceptability and Quality of Intervention Modalities for Suicidality in the Emergency Department: Randomized Feasibility Trial

JMIR Ment Health 2023;10:e49783

DOI: 10.2196/49783

PMID: 37874619

PMCID: 10630858

ReachCare for suicidality in the Emergency Department: Comparing the acceptability and quality of intervention modalities

  • Celine Larkin; 
  • Bengisu Tulu; 
  • Soussan Djamasbi; 
  • Roscoe Garner; 
  • Fatima Varzgani; 
  • Mariam Siddique; 
  • John Pietro; 
  • Edwin D Boudreaux

ABSTRACT

Background:

Emergency departments (EDs) manage many patients with suicide risk, but effective interventions for suicidality are challenging to implement in this setting. ReachCare is a technology-facilitated version of an evidence-based intervention for suicidal ED patients. Here, we present findings on the acceptability and quality of ReachCare in the ED, as well as a comparison of these measures across three potential delivery modalities.

Objective:

Our aim was to test the effectiveness of the ReachCare intervention in its entirety through conducting a feasibility study with patients presenting with suicidality to the ED. We tested three different ways of receiving the ED-based components of ReachCare: (1) self-administered on the tablet application using a chatbot interface; (2) administered by an in-person clinician; or (3) administered by a telehealth clinician.

Methods:

47 ED patients who screened positive for suicide risk were randomly allocated to receive one of three delivery modalities of ReachCare in the ED: (1) self-administered on the patient-facing tablet application with a chatbot interface; (2) delivered by an in-person clinician or (3) delivered by a telehealth clinician, with the latter two utilizing a clinician-facing web application. We measured demographic and clinical characteristics, acceptability and appropriateness of the intervention, and quality and completeness of the resulting safety plans.

Results:

Patients gave high ratings for the acceptability (m=4.16/5, SD = 0.53) and appropriateness (mean=4.15/5, SD= 0.48) of ReachCare’s ED components, and there were no substantial differences across the three delivery modalities [F(acceptability)=0.84, p=0.25; F(appropriateness)=0.84, p=0.44]. The self-administered modality took significantly less time than the two clinician modalities (F=37.22, p<0.001), and the usability of the self-administered version was in the “very high” range (m=88.3/100, SD=12.3). The safety plans created across all three modalities were high-quality (m=28.8/38, SD= 5.17; F= 0.35, p=0.71).

Conclusions:

Patients rated ReachCare in the ED as highly acceptable and appropriate regardless of modality. Self-administration may be a feasible way to ensure patients with suicide risk receive an intervention in resource constrained EDs. Further research will examine the clinical outcomes of patients receiving both the in-ED and post-ED components of ReachCare. Clinical Trial: Clinicaltrials.goc: NCT04720911; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04720911


 Citation

Please cite as:

Larkin C, Tulu B, Djamasbi S, Garner R, Varzgani F, Siddique M, Pietro J, Boudreaux ED

Comparing the Acceptability and Quality of Intervention Modalities for Suicidality in the Emergency Department: Randomized Feasibility Trial

JMIR Ment Health 2023;10:e49783

DOI: 10.2196/49783

PMID: 37874619

PMCID: 10630858

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.