Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Jun 6, 2023
Date Accepted: Nov 20, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Factors Associated With Levels of Public Engagement in Protective Behaviors During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic: Causal-Comparative Study Based on the Health Belief Model

Tang CC, Chen H, Tsai SY, Wu WW

Factors Associated With Levels of Public Engagement in Protective Behaviors During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic: Causal-Comparative Study Based on the Health Belief Model

JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e49687

DOI: 10.2196/49687

PMID: 38113083

PMCID: 10732231

Factors Associated with Levels of Public Engagement in Protective Behaviors during the Early COVID-19 Pandemic: A Causal-Comparative Study Based on the Health Belief Model

  • Chia-Chun Tang; 
  • Hsi Chen; 
  • Shao-Yu Tsai; 
  • Wei-Wen Wu

ABSTRACT

Background:

While the challenges of COVID-19 are still unfolding, the enhancement of protective behavior remains a top priority in global healthcare. However, current behavioral-promoting strategies may be inefficient without first identifying the individuals with lower engagement in protective behavior and associating factors.

Objective:

The goal of this study was to identify individuals with and potential contributing factors to low engagement in protective behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods:

This is a causal comparative study. A theory-based online survey was used to investigate individuals’ protective behavior and potential associating factors. During June 2020, the distribution of the survey was targeted to three areas: Taiwan, Japan, and North America. Based on the theory of Health Belief Model, the survey collected participants’ various perceptions toward COVID-19 and a collection of protective behavior. In addition to descriptive analysis, cluster analysis, analysis of variance, Fisher’s exact test, and chi-square test were employed.

Results:

A total of 384 responses were analyzed. More than half of the respondents lived in Taiwan, followed by Japan, then North America. The respondents were grouped into three clusters according to their engagement level of all protective behavior. These three clusters were significantly different from each other in terms of their sex, residency, perceived barrier, self-efficacy, and cues of action.

Conclusions:

Our results inform future research and policymaking. Specifically, enhancing self-efficacy is a powerful way to ensure the adoption of protective measures. Designing tailored messages for special groups of people is also worth considering.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tang CC, Chen H, Tsai SY, Wu WW

Factors Associated With Levels of Public Engagement in Protective Behaviors During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic: Causal-Comparative Study Based on the Health Belief Model

JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e49687

DOI: 10.2196/49687

PMID: 38113083

PMCID: 10732231

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.