Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Jun 1, 2023
Date Accepted: Nov 6, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Implementation of a Web-Based Program for Advance Care Planning and Evaluation of its Complexity With the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, And Sustainability (NASSS) Framework: Qualitative Evaluation Study

van der Smissen D, Schreijer MA, van Gemert-Pijnen L, Verdaasdonk R, van der Heide A, Korfage IJ, Rietjens JA

Implementation of a Web-Based Program for Advance Care Planning and Evaluation of its Complexity With the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, And Sustainability (NASSS) Framework: Qualitative Evaluation Study

JMIR Aging 2025;8:e49507

DOI: 10.2196/49507

PMID: 40053753

PMCID: 11920655

Implementation of a Web-based Program for Advance Care Planning: Evaluation of Complexity with the NASSS Framework

  • Doris van der Smissen; 
  • Maud A Schreijer; 
  • Lisette van Gemert-Pijnen; 
  • Rudolf Verdaasdonk; 
  • Agnes van der Heide; 
  • Ida J Korfage; 
  • Judith AC Rietjens

ABSTRACT

Background:

The implementation of eHealth applications often fails. The NASSS (non-adoption, abandonment, or fail to scale-up, spread and sustain over time) framework aims to identify complexities in eHealth applications; the more complex, the more risk of implementation failure. Using NASSS, we analyzed the implementation of a web-based advance care planning (ACP) program.

Objective:

We aimed to analyze the implementation of the web-based ACP program ‘Explore your preferences for treatment and care’ using the NASSS framework.

Methods:

We used the NASSS framework to analyze a multi-modal dataset on the web-based ACP program ‘Explore your preferences for treatment and care’ and its development and evaluation, including peer reviewed publications, notes of stakeholder group meetings, and interviews with stakeholders.

Results:

The analysis showed that the web-based ACP program uses straightforward technology, is embedded in a well-established online health platform, and in general appears to generate a positive value for stakeholders. A complexity is the rather broad target population of the program. A potential complexity considers the limited insight into the extent to which healthcare professionals adopt the program. Awareness of the relevance of the web-based ACP program may still be improved among target populations of ACP and among healthcare professionals. Furthermore, the program may especially appeal to those who value individual autonomy, self-management and an explicit and direct communicative approach.

Conclusions:

Relatively few complexities were identified considering the implementation of the web-based ACP program ‘Explore your preferences for treatment and care’. Its uptake might be improved by increasing awareness of ACP and the program among a wider population of potential users and among healthcare professionals.


 Citation

Please cite as:

van der Smissen D, Schreijer MA, van Gemert-Pijnen L, Verdaasdonk R, van der Heide A, Korfage IJ, Rietjens JA

Implementation of a Web-Based Program for Advance Care Planning and Evaluation of its Complexity With the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, And Sustainability (NASSS) Framework: Qualitative Evaluation Study

JMIR Aging 2025;8:e49507

DOI: 10.2196/49507

PMID: 40053753

PMCID: 11920655

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.