Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: May 28, 2023
Date Accepted: May 24, 2024
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Retrospecting Digital Media Use, Negative Emotions, and Trust Gaps during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
ABSTRACT
Background:
In the post-pandemic era, retrospecting trust-related issues offers valuable insights into the effective prevention and control of infectious diseases. The COVID-19 pandemic caused a damage on people’s trust in others, including strangers and acquaintances, while one’s trust in family members remained unchanged. This resulted in two trust gaps, namely, the gap between trust in family members and in strangers (family members-strangers trust gap) and the gap between trust in family members and in acquaintances (family members-acquaintances trust gap). Widening trust gaps hinder social integration and undermine the effective management of public health crises. Digital media use tends to shape people’s perceptions and attitudes toward others. However, little is known about how digital media use influences trust gaps during a pandemic.
Objective:
This study aims to investigate the relationships between digital media use, negative emotions, family members-strangers trust gap, and family members-acquaintances trust gap during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. We test the mediating role of negative emotions between digital media use and the two trust gaps, and compare the indirect effect of digital media use on the two trust gaps via negative emotions.
Methods:
A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted in China between 31 January to 9 February 2020. A total of 1,568 adults participated in the survey. Questions related to digital media use, negative emotions, trust in family members, trust in acquaintances, and trust in strangers during the pandemic were asked. Regression analyses were performed to test the associations between the examined variables. We used a 95% bootstrap confidence interval approach to estimate the mediation effects.
Results:
Digital media use was positively associated with negative emotions (B = 0.17, SE = 0.03, P < .001), which in turn were positively associated with the family members-strangers trust gap (B = 0.15, SE = 0.03, P < .001). Likewise, digital media use was positively associated with negative emotions (B = 0.17, SE = 0.03, P < .001), while negative emotions were positively associated with the family members-acquaintances trust gap (B = 0.08, SE = 0.03, P = .01). Moreover, the indirect effect of digital media use on the family members-strangers trust gap (B = 0.03, SE = 0.01, CI [.01, .04]) was stronger than that on the family members-acquaintances trust gap (B = 0.01, SE = 0.01, CI [.003, .027]).
Conclusions:
The results demonstrate that negative emotions resulting from the frequent use of digital media are a major cause of the widening trust gaps. Considering our increasing reliance on digital media, the findings denote that the appropriate use of digital media helps avoid the overamplification of negative emotions and curb the enlargement of trust gaps, thereby contributing to the effective management of public health crises in the post-pandemic era.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.