Do virtual services increase healthcare inequalities among people under long-term dermatology follow up: are we READHY?
ABSTRACT
Background:
Given the expansion of virtual dermatology NHS services, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a need for methods that identify patients at risk of digital exclusion to guide equitable representation in service co-design processes and tailor virtual services to the needs of their patient population.
Objective:
This quality improvement project (QIP) aims to inform the re-design of virtual services to optimally support the ongoing needs of patients with chronic skin diseases, ensuring this is tailored to their digital health literacy requirements.
Methods:
Cluster analysis of READHY dimensions in responding participants (n=116) revealed seven groups with distinct digital and health literacy characteristics. High READHY scores in groups 1 (n=22 (19.0%)) and 2 (n=20 (17.2%)) represent those confident with managing their health and using technology, whereas the lower-scoring groups, 6 (n=4 (3.4%)) and 7 (n=12 (10.3%)), depended on traditional services. Groups 3 (n=27 (23.3%)), 4 (n=23 (19.8)), and 5 (n=8 (6.9%)) had varying digital skills, access, and engagement, highlighting a population that may benefit from a co-designed dermatology service.
Results:
Cluster analysis of READHY dimensions in responding participants (n=116) revealed seven groups with distinct digital and health literacy characteristics. High READHY scores in groups 1 (n=22 (19.0%)) and 2 (n=20 (17.2%)) represent those confident with managing their health and using technology, whereas the lower-scoring groups, 6 (n=4 (3.4%)) and 7 (n=12 (10.3%)), depended on traditional services. Groups 3 (n=27 (23.3%)), 4 (n=23 (19.8)), and 5 (n=8 (6.9%)) had varying digital skills, access, and engagement, highlighting a population that may benefit from a co-designed dermatology service.
Conclusions:
By identifying patient groups with distinguishable patterns of digital access and health literacy, our method demonstrates that 63.8% of people attending specialist clinics in our centre require support in order to optimise virtual follow-up or need an alternative approach. Future efforts should streamline the READHY question profile to improve utility and employ focus groups to elicit strategies for engaging patients with digital services.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.