Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Nursing

Date Submitted: May 8, 2023
Date Accepted: Aug 4, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Experiences of Using a Digital Guidance and Assessment Tool (the Technology-Optimized Practice Process in Nursing Application) During Clinical Practice in a Nursing Home: Focus Group Study Among Nursing Students

Johnsen HM, Nes AAG, Haddeland K

Experiences of Using a Digital Guidance and Assessment Tool (the Technology-Optimized Practice Process in Nursing Application) During Clinical Practice in a Nursing Home: Focus Group Study Among Nursing Students

JMIR Nursing 2024;7:e48810

DOI: 10.2196/48810

PMID: 39255477

PMCID: 11422751

Nursing Students’ Experiences of Using the digital Guidance and Assessment Tool TOPP-N during Clinical Practice in a Nursing Home: A Qualitative Study

  • Hege Mari Johnsen; 
  • Andréa Aparecida Gonçalves Nes; 
  • Kristine Haddeland

ABSTRACT

Background:

Nursing students´ learning during clinical practice is largely influenced by the quality of the guidance they receive from their registered nurse (RN) preceptors. Students that have attended placement in nursing home settings have called for more time with RNs, and an opportunity for more help from the RNs for reflection and developing critical thinking skills. To strengthen students´ guidance and assessment and enhance students´ learning in the practice setting, it has also been recommended to improve the collaboration between faculties and RNs.

Objective:

This study explores first-year nursing students’ experiences of using the TOPP-N (Technology Optimized Practice Process in Nursing) application in nursing home in Norway. TOPP-N is developed to support guidance and assessment in clinical practice in nursing education.

Methods:

Four focus groups were conducted with 19 nursing students from two university campus in Norway. The data collection and directed content analysis were based on DeLone and McLean’s Information System Success Model.

Results:

Some participants had difficulties in learning to use TOPP-N, particularly the ones that had not attended the one-hour digital course. Further, participants remarked that the content of the TOPP-N guidance module could be better adjusted to their precent clinical practice, level of education and individual achievements to be more usable. Despite this, most participants liked the TOPP-N application’s concept. Using the TOPP-N mobile application for guidance and assessment was found to be very flexible. Frequency and ways of using the application varied among the participants. Most participants perceived that use of TOPP-N facilitated awareness of learning objectives and enabled continuous reflection and feedback from preceptors. However, the findings indicate that the TOPP-N application’s perceived usefulness was highly dependent on the preparedness and use of the app among nurse preceptors (or absence thereof).

Conclusions:

This study offers information about critical success factors perceived by nursing student related to the use of the TOPP-N application. To develop similar Learning Management Systems that are usable and efficient to use, developers should focus on personalising the content, clarifying procedures for use and enhance the training and motivation of users i.e. students, preceptors and educators.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Johnsen HM, Nes AAG, Haddeland K

Experiences of Using a Digital Guidance and Assessment Tool (the Technology-Optimized Practice Process in Nursing Application) During Clinical Practice in a Nursing Home: Focus Group Study Among Nursing Students

JMIR Nursing 2024;7:e48810

DOI: 10.2196/48810

PMID: 39255477

PMCID: 11422751

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.