Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 29, 2023
Date Accepted: Nov 28, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Examining the Type, Quality, and Content of Web-Based Information for People With Chronic Pain Interested in Spinal Cord Stimulation: Social Listening Study

Moens M, Van Doorslaer L, Eeckman E, Billot M, Roulaud M, Rigoard P, Fobelets M, Goudman L

Examining the Type, Quality, and Content of Web-Based Information for People With Chronic Pain Interested in Spinal Cord Stimulation: Social Listening Study

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e48599

DOI: 10.2196/48599

PMID: 38289645

PMCID: 10865187

What web-based information is available for people with chronic pain interested in Spinal Cord Stimulation? A social listening study.

  • Maarten Moens; 
  • Leen Van Doorslaer; 
  • Edgard Eeckman; 
  • Maxime Billot; 
  • Manuel Roulaud; 
  • Philippe Rigoard; 
  • Maaike Fobelets; 
  • Lisa Goudman

ABSTRACT

Background:

The increased availability of online medical information has encouraged chronic pain patients to seek healthcare information from multiple sources, i.e. the consultation of healthcare providers combined with web-based information. The type and quality of information that is available online is very heterogeneous. To date, there are no studies that have identified and evaluated what information is available on the web for patients with chronic pain about neuromodulation.

Objective:

Therefore, the aims of this study are to explore the type, quality, and content of online information regarding Spinal Cord Stimulation for chronic pain that is freely available online and targeted at consumers of healthcare.

Methods:

The social listening tool Awario© was used to search Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, blogs, and the web for suitable hits with “pain” and “neuromodulation” as keywords. Quality appraisal of the extracted information was performed with the DISCERN instrument. Thematic analysis through inductive coding was conducted.

Results:

The initial search identified a total of 2174 entries, of which 630 entries were eventually withheld. Patient information was mainly available through YouTube hits (70.79%). Most posts were originated in the USA (82.38%). Inductive coding revealed four main themes: (1) pain and the burden of pain, (2) neuromodulation as a treatment approach, (3) device related aspects and (4) patient benefits and testimonials of a treatment with SCS.

Conclusions:

Healthcare consumers have access to online information about SCS whereby details about the surgical procedures, the type of material, working mechanisms, risks, patient expectations, and testimonials as well as potential benefits of this therapy option are discussed. No knowledge gaps were detected in the provided information concerning this treatment option. Clinical Trial: NA


 Citation

Please cite as:

Moens M, Van Doorslaer L, Eeckman E, Billot M, Roulaud M, Rigoard P, Fobelets M, Goudman L

Examining the Type, Quality, and Content of Web-Based Information for People With Chronic Pain Interested in Spinal Cord Stimulation: Social Listening Study

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e48599

DOI: 10.2196/48599

PMID: 38289645

PMCID: 10865187

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.