Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Apr 30, 2023
Date Accepted: Dec 15, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessing Patient Trust in Automation in Health Care Systems: Within-Subjects Experimental Study

Nare M, Jurewicz K

Assessing Patient Trust in Automation in Health Care Systems: Within-Subjects Experimental Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e48584

DOI: 10.2196/48584

PMID: 39106096

PMCID: 11336498

An Experimental Study Assessing Patient Trust in Automation in Healthcare Systems

  • Matthew Nare; 
  • Katherina Jurewicz

ABSTRACT

Background:

Healthcare technology has the ability to change patient outcomes for the better when designed appropriately. Automation is becoming smarter and is increasingly being integrated into healthcare work systems.

Objective:

This study focuses on investigating trust between patients and an automated cardiac risk assessment tool (CRAT) in a simulated emergency department (ED) setting.

Methods:

A within-subjects experimental study was performed to investigate differences in automation modes for the CRAT: (1) no automation, (2) automation only, and (3) semi-automation. Participants were asked to enter their symptoms for each scenario into the CRAT, and they would automatically be classified as high, medium, or low risk depending on the symptoms entered. Participants were asked to provide their trust ratings for each combination of risk classification and automation mode.

Results:

Results from this study indicate the participants significantly trusted the semi-automation condition more compared to the automation only condition, and they trusted the no automation condition significantly more than the automation only condition (p < 0.05). Additionally, participants significantly trusted the CRAT more in the high severity scenario compared to the medium severity scenario (p < 0.05). There were also significantly lower trust ratings for participants who stated they had previous ED patient experience compared to those without previous patient experience in the ED (p < 0.05).

Conclusions:

The findings from this study emphasize the importance of the human component of automation when designing automated technology in healthcare systems. Automation and artificially intelligent systems are becoming more prevalent in healthcare systems, and this work emphasizes the need to consider the human element when designing automation into care delivery.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Nare M, Jurewicz K

Assessing Patient Trust in Automation in Health Care Systems: Within-Subjects Experimental Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e48584

DOI: 10.2196/48584

PMID: 39106096

PMCID: 11336498

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.