Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Apr 25, 2023
Date Accepted: Dec 15, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Ethnic Disparities in COVID-19 Vaccine Mistrust and Receipt in British Columbia, Canada: Population Survey

Mahmood B, Adu P, McKee G, Bharmal A, Wilton J, Janjua NZ

Ethnic Disparities in COVID-19 Vaccine Mistrust and Receipt in British Columbia, Canada: Population Survey

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2024;10:e48466

DOI: 10.2196/48466

PMID: 38363596

PMCID: 10896316

Ethnic disparities in COVID-19 vaccine mistrust and receipt in British Columbia, Canada: Population Survey

  • Bushra Mahmood; 
  • Prince Adu; 
  • Geoffrey McKee; 
  • Aamir Bharmal; 
  • James Wilton; 
  • Naveed Zafar Janjua

ABSTRACT

Background:

Racialized populations in the United States, Canada and UK have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19. Higher vaccine hesitancy has been reported among racial/ethnic minorities in some of these countries. In the UK for example, higher vaccine hesitancy has been observed among the South Asian population and Black compared to the White population and this has been attributed to lack of trust in government due to historical and ongoing racism and discrimination.

Objective:

To assess vaccine receipt by ethnicity and its relationship with mistrust among ethnic groups in British Columbia (BC), Canada.

Methods:

We included adults ≥18 years of age participating in the BC COVID-19 Population Mixing Patterns Survey (BC-Mix) from March 8, 2021, to August 8, 2022. The survey included questions about vaccine receipt and beliefs based on a behavioral framework. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between mistrust in vaccines and vaccine receipt among ethnic groups.

Results:

The analysis included 25,640 adults. Overall, 76.7% of respondents reported having received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccines (Chinese=86.1%, South Asian=79.6%, White=75.5%, Other ethnicity=73.2%). Overall, 13.7% of respondents reported mistrust of COVID-19 vaccines (Chinese=7.1%,South Asian=8.2%, White=15.4%, Other ethnicity=15.2%). In the multivariable model (adjusting for age, sex, educational attainment, and household size), mistrust was associated with a 93% reduced odds of vaccine receipt (aORs=0.07, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.08). In the models stratified by ethnicity, mistrust was associated with 81.0%, 92.0%, 94.0% and 95.0% reduced odds of vaccine receipt among South Asian, Chinese, White, and other ethnicities respectively.

Conclusions:

Overall vaccine receipt among those who identified as South Asian and Chinese in BC was higher than the White population and these population groups had lower mistrust in vaccines. Vaccine mistrust was associated with a lower odds of vaccine receipt in all ethnicities, but the magnitude of this association was less pronounced among South Asian and Chinese populations.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Mahmood B, Adu P, McKee G, Bharmal A, Wilton J, Janjua NZ

Ethnic Disparities in COVID-19 Vaccine Mistrust and Receipt in British Columbia, Canada: Population Survey

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2024;10:e48466

DOI: 10.2196/48466

PMID: 38363596

PMCID: 10896316

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.