Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 10, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 9, 2023 - Jun 4, 2023
Date Accepted: Nov 22, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Examining Human-Smartphone Interaction as a Proxy for Circadian Rhythm in Patients With Insomnia: Cross-Sectional Study

Lin C, Chen IM, Chuang HH, Wang ZW, Lin HH, Lin YH

Examining Human-Smartphone Interaction as a Proxy for Circadian Rhythm in Patients With Insomnia: Cross-Sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e48044

DOI: 10.2196/48044

PMID: 38100195

PMCID: 10757227

Examining Human-Smartphone Interaction as a Proxy for Circadian Rhythm in Patients with Insomnia: A Cross-Sectional Study

  • Chen Lin; 
  • I-Ming Chen; 
  • Hai-Hua Chuang; 
  • Zih-Wen Wang; 
  • Hsiao-Han Lin; 
  • Yu-Hsuan Lin

ABSTRACT

Background:

The sleep and circadian rhythm of smartphone usage, which is based on mental activities, may correlate with sleep quality and depressive symptoms as much as the current standard of physical activity-based actigraphy does.

Objective:

This study aimed to develop app-defined circadian rhythm and sleep indicators, and compare them with actigraphy circadian rhythm and sleep indicators, as well as examine the clinical validation of these indicators in insomnia patients and healthy controls

Methods:

We developed the mobile app, Rhythm, to record the timestamps of smartphone usage and calculate circadian rhythms in 33 insomnia patients and 33 age-, gender-matched healthy controls, totaling 2,097 person-days, and in parallel utilized standard actigraphy to quantify subjects’ sleep-wake cycles. Sleep indicators included sleep onset, wake time, wake after sleep onset (WASO), and the number of awakenings (NAWK). Circadian rhythm metrics quantified the relative amplitude (RA), interdaily stability, and intradaily variability (IV) based on either smartphone usage or physical activity data.

Results:

There were no significant differences between app-defined and actigraphy-defined sleep onsets, wake times, total sleep times and NAWK. Both app-defined sleep indicators, as well as actigraphy-defined sleep indicators could identify clinical manifestations of insomnia; they include longer WASO, higher NAWK, and later sleep onset and wake time in insomnia patients than in healthy controls. In addition, the PSQI scores were positively correlated with WASO and NAWK, whether measured by app or actigraphy. Depressive symptom scores were positively correlated with IVapp, and negatively correlated with RAact, as individuals with depression typically presented disrupted circadian rhythmicity. Meanwhile, the depressive symptom scores were negatively correlated with IVact and not significantly correlated with RAapp.

Conclusions:

Sleep and circadian rhythms derived from smartphone usage showed potential to be digital biomarkers, similar to those from standard actigraphy. Clinical Trial: None


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lin C, Chen IM, Chuang HH, Wang ZW, Lin HH, Lin YH

Examining Human-Smartphone Interaction as a Proxy for Circadian Rhythm in Patients With Insomnia: Cross-Sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e48044

DOI: 10.2196/48044

PMID: 38100195

PMCID: 10757227

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.