Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Mar 24, 2023
Date Accepted: Jul 5, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Working Memory Training for Children Using the Adaptive, Self-Select, and Stepwise Approaches to Setting the Difficulty Level of Training Activities: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Lau RC, Anderson P, Wiley JF, Huang D, Surjatin F, McIntosh P, Gathercole S, Spencer-Smith M

Working Memory Training for Children Using the Adaptive, Self-Select, and Stepwise Approaches to Setting the Difficulty Level of Training Activities: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e47496

DOI: 10.2196/47496

PMID: 37725418

PMCID: 10548317

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Working Memory Training in Children Aged 7-11 Years Evaluating the Adaptive, Self-Select and Stepwise Approaches to Setting the Difficulty of Training Activities: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Regine Cassandra Lau; 
  • Peter Anderson; 
  • Joshua F Wiley; 
  • Derek Huang; 
  • Faisha Surjatin; 
  • Paul McIntosh; 
  • Susan Gathercole; 
  • Megan Spencer-Smith

ABSTRACT

Background:

A common yet untested assumption of cognitive training in children is that training activities should be adaptive, with difficulty adjusted to the individual’s performance, in order to maximize training outcomes.

Objective:

This trial aimed to examine children’s outcomes of working memory training using adaptive, self-select and stepwise approaches to setting the difficulty of training activities compared to an active control condition immediately and 6 months post-intervention. While the aim is exploratory, we hypothesized that children allocated to a working memory training condition will show greater improvements: (1) on near transfer measures compared to intermediate and far transfer measures; and (2) immediately post-intervention compared to 6 months post-intervention.

Methods:

This blinded, active-controlled, parallel-group randomized trial aimed to recruit 128 children aged 7 to 11 years from one primary school. Following baseline testing, children were randomized into one of four conditions: adaptive, self-select or stepwise working memory training, or active control. An experimental intervention embedded in Minecraft was developed for teachers to deliver in the classroom daily over two consecutive weeks (10 x 20-minute sessions). The working memory training comprised two training activities with processing demands similar to daily activities: backward span and following instructions. The control comprised creative activities. Children completed a set of working memory measures (near and intermediate transfer), the Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices (far transfer) to determine training outcomes, and intrinsic motivation questionnaires to determine expectations of the intervention. Caregivers completed the ADHD Rating Scale-5 to measure their child’s attention (far transfer).

Results:

Data collection concluded in December 2022. Data is currently being processed and analyzed.

Conclusions:

This trial will determine whether the adaptive approach to setting the difficulty of training activities maximizes cognitive training outcomes for children. This trial has several strengths: adopts best practices for cognitive training studies (design, methods, analysis plan); uses a range of measures to detect discrete levels of transfer; a 6 months post-intervention follow-up assessment; appropriately powered; and uses an experimental working memory training intervention based on current understanding of the cognitive mechanisms of training. Findings will inform future research and design of cognitive training interventions, and highlight the value of evidence-based principles of cognitive training. Clinical Trial: The Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12621000990820; https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12621000990820.aspx


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lau RC, Anderson P, Wiley JF, Huang D, Surjatin F, McIntosh P, Gathercole S, Spencer-Smith M

Working Memory Training for Children Using the Adaptive, Self-Select, and Stepwise Approaches to Setting the Difficulty Level of Training Activities: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e47496

DOI: 10.2196/47496

PMID: 37725418

PMCID: 10548317

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.