Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Mar 20, 2023
Date Accepted: Dec 20, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Willingness to Use Digital Health Screening and Tracking Tools for Public Health in Sexual Minority Populations in a National Probability Sample: Quantitative Intersectional Analysis

Vincent W

Willingness to Use Digital Health Screening and Tracking Tools for Public Health in Sexual Minority Populations in a National Probability Sample: Quantitative Intersectional Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e47448

DOI: 10.2196/47448

PMID: 38457790

PMCID: 10960216

Willingness to Use Digital Health Screening and Tracking Tools for Public Health in Sexual Minority Populations in a National Probability Sample: A Quantitative, Intersectional Analysis

  • Wilson Vincent

ABSTRACT

Background:

Little is known about sexual minority adults’ willingness to use digital health tools, such as pandemic-related tools for screening and tracking, outside of HIV prevention and intervention efforts for sexual minority men, specifically. Additionally, given the current cultural climate in the United States (US), heterosexual and sexual minority adults may differ in their willingness to use digital health tools, and there may be within-group differences among sexual minority adults.

Objective:

The present study compared sexual minority and heterosexual adults’ willingness to use COVID-19-related digital health tools for public health screening and tracking and tested whether sexual minority adults differed from each other by age group, gender, and race or ethnicity.

Methods:

Data were from a cross-sectional, national probability survey (n=2,047) implemented May 30–June 8, 2020 in the US during the height of the public health response to COVID-19. Using latent-variable modeling, heterosexual and sexual minority adults were tested for differences in their willingness to use digital health tools for public health screening and tracking. Among sexual minority adults, specifically, associations with age, gender, and race or ethnicity were assessed.

Results:

On average, sexual minority adults showed greater willingness to use digital health tools for screening and tracking than heterosexual adults (latent factor mean difference=0.46, 95% confidence interval: 0.15, 0.77). Among sexual minority adults, there were no differences by age group, gender, or race or ethnicity.

Conclusions:

In the US, sexual minority adults were more willing to use digital health tools for screening and tracking than heterosexual adults. Sexual minority adults did not differ from each other by age, gender, or race/ethnicity in terms of their willingness to use these digital health tools. Findings support the use of digital health tools, including mobile health applications with sexual minority adults, which could be important for other public health-related concerns, such as monkeypox.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Vincent W

Willingness to Use Digital Health Screening and Tracking Tools for Public Health in Sexual Minority Populations in a National Probability Sample: Quantitative Intersectional Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e47448

DOI: 10.2196/47448

PMID: 38457790

PMCID: 10960216

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.