Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Mar 15, 2023
Date Accepted: Jul 4, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Clinicians’ Perspectives and Proposed Solutions to Improve Contraceptive Counseling in the United States: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study With Clinicians From the Society of Family Planning

Goueth R, Holt K, Eden KB, Hoffman AS

Clinicians’ Perspectives and Proposed Solutions to Improve Contraceptive Counseling in the United States: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study With Clinicians From the Society of Family Planning

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e47298

DOI: 10.2196/47298

PMID: 37603407

PMCID: 10477923

Clinicians’ Perspectives and Proposed Solutions to Improve Contraceptive Counseling in the United States: A Qualitative Study

  • Rose Goueth; 
  • Kelsey Holt; 
  • Karen B Eden; 
  • Aubri S Hoffman

ABSTRACT

Background:

Patients’ challenges with contraceptive counseling and decision making are well documented, but clinicians’ challenges in providing counseling and decision support have been minimally explored.

Objective:

The objective of this study is to elicit clinicians’ perspectives on patients’ contraceptive decision-making needs and current contraceptive counseling practices to inform efforts to improve decision aids and other tools to aid clinicians in providing patient-centered counseling.

Methods:

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 experienced United States-based family planning-focused clinicians from the Society of Family Planning professional society. An inductive content analysis approach revealed themes within our data. All transcripts were coded with an evolving codebook, with the first five transcripts recoded from the finalized codebook.

Results:

Twelve medical doctors and three nurse practitioners with an average of 19 years of experience participated. Our content analysis revealed three main barriers to the provision of quality patient-centered contraceptive counseling: patient and clinician biases that impede patient-clinician communication, time constraints, and gaps in patient sexual health knowledge. Clinicians suggested multi-level solutions to facilitate patient-centered counseling, including additional sexual health education and the use of decision tools.

Conclusions:

Based on these qualitative findings, solutions like patient decision aids should be improved upon to acknowledge time constraints, address patient and clinician biases, and create a foundation of sexual health knowledge. The family planning clinicians in our study also identified clinician- and system-level changes, including improved clinician training and outlets for addressing patient sexual health knowledge gaps, necessary for promoting patient-centered contraceptive counseling. A multi-level approach must be used to improve the overall quality of contraceptive counseling and care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Goueth R, Holt K, Eden KB, Hoffman AS

Clinicians’ Perspectives and Proposed Solutions to Improve Contraceptive Counseling in the United States: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study With Clinicians From the Society of Family Planning

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e47298

DOI: 10.2196/47298

PMID: 37603407

PMCID: 10477923

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.