Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Feb 14, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 14, 2023 - Apr 11, 2023
Date Accepted: Jun 21, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Optimizing Patient-Reported Outcome Collection and Documentation in Medical Music Therapy: Process-Improvement Study

Rodgers-Melnick SN, Block S, Rivard RL, Dusek JA

Optimizing Patient-Reported Outcome Collection and Documentation in Medical Music Therapy: Process-Improvement Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e46528

DOI: 10.2196/46528

PMID: 37498646

PMCID: 10415937

Optimizing Patient-Reported Outcome Collection and Documentation in Medical Music Therapy: A Process Improvement Study

  • Samuel N. Rodgers-Melnick; 
  • Seneca Block; 
  • Rachael L. Rivard; 
  • Jeffery A. Dusek

ABSTRACT

Background:

To measure the effectiveness of nonpharmacologic interventions delivered during clinical care, investigators need to ensure robust and routine data collection without disrupting individualized patient care or adding unnecessary documentation burden.

Objective:

A process-improvement study was undertaken to improve documentation consistency and increase the capture of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) (i.e., stress, pain, anxiety, and coping) within a medical music therapy (MT) team.

Methods:

Two Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were utilized to improve documentation processes among a MT team (13.3 clinical fulltime equivalent staff). Trainings focused on providing skills and resources for optimizing pre- and post-session PRO collection, specific guidelines for entering session data in the electronic health record (EHR), and opportunities for the team to provide feedback. Two comparisons of therapists’ PRO collection rates were conducted: 1) between the 6 months prior to PDSA Cycle 1 (T0) and PDSA Cycle 1 (T1), and 2) between T1 and PDSA Cycle 2 (T2).

Results:

Music therapists’ rates of capturing any PRO increased significantly (P < .001) from T0 to T1 and from T1 to T2 for all domains including stress (0.1%, 36.3%, 50.7%), pain (29.7%, 51.8%, 61.4%), anxiety (18.1%, 34.1%, 51.6%), and coping (0.0%, 20.5%, 41.2%) at T0, T1, and T2 respectively. Music therapists’ feedback and findings from a retrospective analysis were used to create an improved EHR documentation template.

Conclusions:

Rates of PRO data collection improved within the medical MT team. Although the process-improvement in this study was applied to a nonpharmacologic, MT intervention, the principles are applicable to numerous inpatient clinical providers. As hospitals continue to implement nonpharmacologic therapies in response to the Joint Commission recommendations, routine PRO collection will provide future researchers with the ability to evaluate the impact of these therapies on pain relief and opioid utilization.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Rodgers-Melnick SN, Block S, Rivard RL, Dusek JA

Optimizing Patient-Reported Outcome Collection and Documentation in Medical Music Therapy: Process-Improvement Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e46528

DOI: 10.2196/46528

PMID: 37498646

PMCID: 10415937

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.