Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Feb 14, 2023
Date Accepted: Jul 25, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Use of Online Consultation Systems or Remote Consulting in England Characterized Through the Primary Care Health Records of 53 Million People in the OpenSAFELY Platform: Retrospective Cohort Study

Fonseca M, MacKenna B, Mehrkar A, The OpenSAFELY Collaborative , Walters CE, Hickman G, Pearson J, Fisher L, Inglesby P, Bacon S, Davy S, Hulme W, Goldacre B, Koffman O, Bakhai M

The Use of Online Consultation Systems or Remote Consulting in England Characterized Through the Primary Care Health Records of 53 Million People in the OpenSAFELY Platform: Retrospective Cohort Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2024;10:e46485

DOI: 10.2196/46485

PMID: 39292500

PMCID: 11447420

Use of online consultation systems or remote consulting in England characterised though 53 million peoples’ primary care health records in OpenSAFELY: a retrospective cohort study

  • Martina Fonseca; 
  • Brian MacKenna; 
  • Amir Mehrkar; 
  • The OpenSAFELY Collaborative; 
  • Caroline E Walters; 
  • George Hickman; 
  • Jonathan Pearson; 
  • Louis Fisher; 
  • Peter Inglesby; 
  • Seb Bacon; 
  • Simon Davy; 
  • William Hulme; 
  • Ben Goldacre; 
  • Ofra Koffman; 
  • Minal Bakhai

ABSTRACT

Background:

The pandemic accelerated work by the NHS in England to enable and stimulate use of online consultation systems across all practices, for improved access to primary care.

Objective:

We aimed to explore general practice coding activity associated with the use of online consultation systems in terms of trends, COVID-19 effect, variation and quality.

Methods:

With the approval of NHS England, OpenSAFELY-TPP and OpenSAFELY-EMIS were used to query and analyse in situ records of electronic health record systems of over 53 million patients in over 6,400 practices, mainly in 2019-2020. SNOMED CT codes relevant to online consultation systems and written online consultations were identified. Coded events were described by volumes, practice coverage, trends pre- and post-COVID-19 and inter-practice and sociodemographic variation.

Results:

3,550,762 relevant coding events were found in TPP practices, with code eConsultation detected in 84% of practices. Coding activity related to digital forms of interaction increased rapidly from March 2020 at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, though we found large variation in coding instance rates among practices in England. Code instances were more commonly found among females, those aged 18-40, those least deprived or white. eConsultation coded activity was more commonly found recorded among patients with a history of asthma or depression.

Conclusions:

We successfully queried general practice coding activity relevant to the use of online consultation systems, showing increased adoption as well as key areas of variation during the COVID-19 pandemic. The work can be expanded to support monitoring of coding quality and underlying activity. In future, large-scale impact evaluation studies can be implemented within the platform, namely looking at resource utilisation and patient outcomes.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Fonseca M, MacKenna B, Mehrkar A, The OpenSAFELY Collaborative , Walters CE, Hickman G, Pearson J, Fisher L, Inglesby P, Bacon S, Davy S, Hulme W, Goldacre B, Koffman O, Bakhai M

The Use of Online Consultation Systems or Remote Consulting in England Characterized Through the Primary Care Health Records of 53 Million People in the OpenSAFELY Platform: Retrospective Cohort Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2024;10:e46485

DOI: 10.2196/46485

PMID: 39292500

PMCID: 11447420

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.