Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Diabetes

Date Submitted: Jan 30, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 30, 2023 - Mar 27, 2023
Date Accepted: Dec 20, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effectiveness of a Continuous Remote Temperature Monitoring Program to Reduce Foot Ulcers and Amputations: Multicenter Postmarket Registry Study

Shih CD, Scholten HJ, Ripp G, Srikanth K, Smith C, Ma R, Fu J, Reyzelman AM

Effectiveness of a Continuous Remote Temperature Monitoring Program to Reduce Foot Ulcers and Amputations: Multicenter Postmarket Registry Study

JMIR Diabetes 2024;9:e46096

DOI: 10.2196/46096

PMID: 38285493

PMCID: 10862242

Continuous Remote Temperature Monitoring Program Reduces Foot Ulcers and Amputations: A Multicenter Post-Market Registry Study

  • Chia-Ding Shih; 
  • Henk Jan Scholten; 
  • Gavin Ripp; 
  • Kirthana Srikanth; 
  • Caileigh Smith; 
  • Ran Ma; 
  • Jie Fu; 
  • Alexander M Reyzelman

ABSTRACT

Background:

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a devastating complication of diabetes and a leading cause of non-traumatic foot amputations. Traditional methods of monitoring and managing patients with diabetes, such as periodic in-person clinic visits, may not be sufficient for preventing DFUs and amputations. Continuous Remote Temperature Monitoring has the potential to capture the critical period before the foot ulcers develop and to improve outcomes by providing real-time data and early interventions. For the first time, the effectiveness of such a strategy to prevent DFUs and amputations among high-risk patients in a real-world commercial setting is reported.

Objective:

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a real-world continuous remote temperature monitoring program in preventing DFUs and amputations in patients with diabetes.

Methods:

In this retrospective analysis of a real-world continuous remote temperature monitoring program, 109 high risk patients identified by clinical providers from 15 geographically diverse private podiatry offices were analyzed. Patients received continuous remote monitoring socks as part of the program. The enrollment was based on medical necessity as decided by their managing physician. We evaluated data from up to 2 years before enrollment and up to 3 years during the program. Primary outcome was the rate of wound development. Secondary outcomes included amputation rate, severity of the foot ulcers, and the number of visits to an outpatient podiatry clinic after enrolling in the program.

Results:

We observed significantly lower rates of foot ulceration (relative risk reduction (RRR) 0.69; number needed to treat (NNT) 5.0; 95% CI 0.80, 0.53; p<0.0001), less moderate to severe ulcers (RRR 0.87; NNT 15.3; 95% CI 0.94, 0.72; p<0.0001), less amputations (RRR 0.87; NNT 74.8; 95% CI 0.98, 0.047; p<0.0056), and less hospitalizations (RRR 0.65; NNT 9.4; 95% CI 0.82, 0.33; p<0.0016). We found an increase in outpatient podiatry office visits during the program (RRR 1.27; absolute risk reduction (ARR) 1.45; 95% CI 0.162, 0.397; p<0.0001).

Conclusions:

Our findings suggested that a real-world continuous remote temperature monitoring program was an effective strategy to prevent DFU development and non-traumatic foot amputation among high-risk patients. Clinical Trial: WCG-IRB (1284366)


 Citation

Please cite as:

Shih CD, Scholten HJ, Ripp G, Srikanth K, Smith C, Ma R, Fu J, Reyzelman AM

Effectiveness of a Continuous Remote Temperature Monitoring Program to Reduce Foot Ulcers and Amputations: Multicenter Postmarket Registry Study

JMIR Diabetes 2024;9:e46096

DOI: 10.2196/46096

PMID: 38285493

PMCID: 10862242

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.