Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jan 21, 2023
Date Accepted: Dec 15, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Sleep Patterns of Premedical Undergraduate Students: Pilot Study and Protocol Evaluation

Rajput G, Gao A, Wu TC, Tsai CT, Molano J, Wu DT

Sleep Patterns of Premedical Undergraduate Students: Pilot Study and Protocol Evaluation

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e45910

DOI: 10.2196/45910

PMID: 38306175

PMCID: 10873796

Sleep Patterns of Pre-med Undergraduate Students: A Pilot Study and Protocol Evaluation

  • Gargi Rajput; 
  • Andy Gao; 
  • Tzu-Chun Wu; 
  • Ching-Tzu Tsai; 
  • Jennifer Molano; 
  • Danny T.Y. Wu

ABSTRACT

Background:

Poor sleep hygiene persists in college students today, despite its heavy implications in adolescent development and academic performance. While previous literature has explored sleep patterns in undergraduates at a broad scale, no studies have exclusively assessed undergraduate medical students or pre-medicine (pre-med) college students. A gap also exists in knowledge of how students perceive their sleep patterns compared to their actual patterns.

Objective:

This study aims to address two research questions (RQs). What are the sleep patterns of pre-med college students (RQ1)? Would the proposed study protocol be feasible to examine the perception of sleep quality and promote sleep behavioral changes in pre-med college students (RQ2)?

Methods:

To analyze RQ1, a survey was conducted on pre-med students in a medical science baccalaureate program in a research one university in the Midwest United States to investigate their sleep habits and understand their demographics. To examine RQ2, five students were recruited from the survey pool to evaluate feasibility of the proposed protocol in addressing perception of sleep quality and changes.

Results:

Based on the 103 survey responses, pre-med students slept an average of 7.1 hours per night. A quarter of the participants had a poor sleep quality (PSQI≥5), although there was with no significant differences in proportions of Good (PSQI≥5) vs. Poor sleepers across cohorts. When students perceived no problem at all in their sleep quality, 50% were defined as having poor sleep quality. A larger proportion of students who perceived sleep quality as only a slight problem, still had 25% students presenting poor sleep quality. High stress levels were generally associated with poor sleep quality. The protocol evaluation revealed Fitbit as a beneficial tool in raising sleep awareness. Participants highlighted Fitbit elements that aid in comprehension, as well as room for improvement in the protocol.

Conclusions:

Poor sleep quality experienced by unaware pre-med students points to a need to raise sleep awareness and develop effective interventions. Future work should refine the study protocol based on lessons learned and health behavior theories and use Fitbit as an informatics solution to promote healthy sleep behaviors.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Rajput G, Gao A, Wu TC, Tsai CT, Molano J, Wu DT

Sleep Patterns of Premedical Undergraduate Students: Pilot Study and Protocol Evaluation

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e45910

DOI: 10.2196/45910

PMID: 38306175

PMCID: 10873796

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.