Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Date Submitted: Jan 20, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 20, 2023 - Feb 3, 2023
Date Accepted: Jul 18, 2023
Date Submitted to PubMed: Jul 19, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
The Oklahoma ACEs Surveillance Index System (OASIS)
ABSTRACT
Background:
Developmental trauma depending on a number of factors may lead to later adult health risks and is an increasing public health concern especially in states with predominantly rural populations. Oklahoma remains one of the highest states in America of ACEs counts, therefore more refined research methods in quantifying ACEs are vital for ensuring proper statewide interventions.
Objective:
Create the methodology to assess ACE severity in Oklahoma at the county level by both quantity of ACE rates as well as severity over time.
Methods:
County-level data for six ACEs (mental illness, divorce, neglect, physical abuse, and substance use) were collected from Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Oklahoma State Department of Health, and Oklahoma Community Mental Health Centers for the years 2010-2018. First, an All ACEs Score (AAS) was created by standardizing and adding county rates for each ACE. Second, an Adversity Severity Index (ASI) was calculated through above-mean tabulation of county ACE rates compared to the state mean, over the years of study data. Data analysis was conducted in 2022.
Results:
Mental illness and substance use showed the highest rates at the state level. ASI scores ranged from 0 to 6, with four nonmetro counties (Adair, McCurtain, Muskogee, and Pittsburg) receiving a score of 6.
Conclusions:
OASIS involves identification of counties where ACEs are most prevalent, allowing for the prioritization of interventions in these “hot spot” counties. A further analysis of other upstream factors, including Social Determinants of Health, can be explored and examined for correlation. Future efforts will center on adding additional ACEs, improving data collection, adding adverse outcome rates (such as violence, medical disorder prevalence, etc), and validity testing.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.