Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Diabetes

Date Submitted: Dec 22, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 21, 2022 - Jan 9, 2023
Date Accepted: Feb 20, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Clinician Experiences With Hybrid Closed Loop Insulin Delivery Systems in Veterans With Type 1 Diabetes: Qualitative Study

Mizokami-Stout K, Thompson HM, Hurren K, Leone V, Piatt GA, Lee JM, Pop-Busui R, DeJonckheere M

Clinician Experiences With Hybrid Closed Loop Insulin Delivery Systems in Veterans With Type 1 Diabetes: Qualitative Study

JMIR Diabetes 2023;8:e45241

DOI: 10.2196/45241

PMID: 36989019

PMCID: 10132000

Clinician Experiences with Hybrid Closed Loop Insulin Delivery Systems in Veterans with Type 1 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study

  • Kara Mizokami-Stout; 
  • Holly M. Thompson; 
  • Kathryn Hurren; 
  • Virginia Leone; 
  • Gretchen A. Piatt; 
  • Joyce M Lee; 
  • Rodica Pop-Busui; 
  • Melissa DeJonckheere

ABSTRACT

Background:

Hybrid closed loop (HCL) insulin pumps adjust insulin delivery based on input from a continuous glucose monitor. Several systems are FDA approved and associated with improved time in range, reduction in hemoglobin A1c, and decreased incidence of hypoglycemia. Major diabetes guidelines differ in their strength of recommendations regarding the use of HCL systems. Overall, limited information about the factors that influence HCL pump clinical decision-making is available, especially among endocrinology clinicians.

Objective:

The study objective is to describe the knowledge and attitudes, network support, and self-efficacy regarding HCL insulin delivery systems among endocrinology clinicians in the Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System.

Methods:

Following a descriptive approach, this qualitative study utilized semi-structured interviews and inductive thematic analysis. Thirteen endocrinologists, endocrinology fellows, and nurses were invited to participate in one-on-one phone interviews. Thematic analysis explored clinician perspectives on HCL insulin pump systems.

Results:

Participants (n=11) had experience within VA and university healthcare system endocrinology clinics. From their experiences, 4 themes were identified involving the evaluation and assessment of insulin pump candidates, prescribing challenges, clinical benefits of HCL pumps, and overall clinician confidence.

Conclusions:

Findings suggest that clinicians believe HCL systems have significant glycemic benefits but are not appropriate for all patients, especially those with cognitive impairment. HCL pump initiation is a multi-step process requiring an interdisciplinary team of healthcare clinicians to ensure patient and pump success. Furthermore, HCL systems improve clinician confidence in overall diabetes management. Clinical Trial: Not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Mizokami-Stout K, Thompson HM, Hurren K, Leone V, Piatt GA, Lee JM, Pop-Busui R, DeJonckheere M

Clinician Experiences With Hybrid Closed Loop Insulin Delivery Systems in Veterans With Type 1 Diabetes: Qualitative Study

JMIR Diabetes 2023;8:e45241

DOI: 10.2196/45241

PMID: 36989019

PMCID: 10132000

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.