Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Dec 22, 2022
Date Accepted: Feb 16, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Perceptions About Augmented Reality in Remote Medical Care: Interview Study of Emergency Telemedicine Providers

Dinh A, Tseng E, Yin AL, Estrin D, Greenwald P, Fortenko A

Perceptions About Augmented Reality in Remote Medical Care: Interview Study of Emergency Telemedicine Providers

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e45211

DOI: 10.2196/45211

PMID: 36976628

PMCID: 10131657

Perceptions of Augmented Reality in Remote Medical Care: Interview Study of Emergency Telemedicine Providers

  • Alana Dinh; 
  • Emily Tseng; 
  • Andrew Lukas Yin; 
  • Deborah Estrin; 
  • Peter Greenwald; 
  • Alexander Fortenko

ABSTRACT

Background:

Augmented (AR) and virtual reality (VR) have increasingly appeared in the medical literature in the past decade, with AR recently being studied for its potential role in remote healthcare delivery and communication. Despite the emergence of literature describing AR’s implementation in telemedicine contexts such as remote emergency services, studies have yet to investigate the perspectives of telemedicine providers for this novel technology.

Objective:

This study aims to understand the applications and challenges of AR in telemedicine anticipated by emergency medicine providers.

Methods:

Across 10 academic medical institutions, 21 emergency medicine providers with variable exposures to telemedicine and AR/VR technology were recruited for semi-structured interviews. The interview questions focused on various potential uses of AR, obstacles that prevent its implementation into the telemedicine space, and how providers and patients might respond to its introduction. We included video demonstrations of a prototype utilizing AR during the interviews to elicit more informed and complete insights regarding AR’s potential. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed via thematic coding.

Results:

Our study identified two major areas of utility for AR in telemedicine. First, AR is perceived to facilitate information-gathering through enhancing observation tasks and granting simultaneous access to data and remote experts. Second, AR is anticipated to supplement distance learning of both minor and major procedures, as well as non-procedural skills for patients and trainees such as cue recognition and empathy. AR may also supplement long-distance education programs and thereby support less specialized medical facilities. However, the addition of AR may exacerbate pre-existing barriers to telemedicine, and providers require extensive research, institutional support and early training prior to adopting novel tools like AR. Although an overall mixed reception is anticipated, consumer adoption and awareness are key components in AR’s adoption.

Conclusions:

AR offers a diversity of applications in remote healthcare delivery and education, but faces obstacles related to a lack of access, infrastructure and familiarity. This paper discusses potential areas of investigation that would inform future design and approaches to implementing AR in telemedicine.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Dinh A, Tseng E, Yin AL, Estrin D, Greenwald P, Fortenko A

Perceptions About Augmented Reality in Remote Medical Care: Interview Study of Emergency Telemedicine Providers

JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e45211

DOI: 10.2196/45211

PMID: 36976628

PMCID: 10131657

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.