Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Dec 8, 2022
Date Accepted: Jul 3, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Impact of Social Media Use Interventions on Mental Well-Being: Systematic Review

Plackett R, Blyth A, Schartau P

The Impact of Social Media Use Interventions on Mental Well-Being: Systematic Review

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e44922

DOI: 10.2196/44922

PMID: 37565693

PMCID: 10457695

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Impact of Problematic Social Media Use Interventions on Mental Well-Being: A Systematic Review

  • Ruth Plackett; 
  • Alexandra Blyth; 
  • Patricia Schartau

ABSTRACT

Background:

Problematic social media use occurs when social media interferes with a person’s daily life and mental well-being. Problematic social media use interventions, e.g., abstinence from social media, have the potential to improve users’ mental well-being. However, there is limited understanding of the effectiveness of this and other types of interventions.

Objective:

This systematic review aimed to synthesise literature on the effectiveness of problematic social media use interventions in improving mental well-being in adults.

Methods:

A systematic search (2004 – June 2022) was completed across three databases in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Experimental studies evaluating the impact of problematic social media use interventions on mental well-being in adults were included. Outcomes related to mental well-being, such as depression, anxiety, stress and loneliness, were included. A narrative synthesis without meta-analysis was completed to summarise study characteristics and effectiveness by outcomes and intervention type. The Quality Assessment Tool was used to measure quality.

Results:

Of 2,785 results, 17 studies were included in analysis. Most studies (9/17, 53%) found improvements in mental well-being, five (5/17, 29%) found mixed effects and three found no effect on mental well-being. Therapy-based interventions, that used techniques like Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, were more effective than limiting use or full abstinence from social media, with 83% (5/6) of these studies showing significant improvements in mental well-being, compared to 50% (2/4) and 43% (3/7) respectively. Depression was the most frequently investigated and improved outcome with 67% (6/9) showing a significant improvement in depression after the intervention, while other outcomes showed more varied results. Quality was poor with 94% (16/17) of studies receiving a weak global score, mostly for issues with selection bias.

Conclusions:

This review provides some evidence that problematic social media use interventions are effective in improving mental well-being, especially for depression and when using therapy-based interventions. Further experimental and longitudinal research is needed with representative samples to investigate who may benefit most from problematic social media use interventions. This will help to develop guidance and recommendations for policymakers and clinicians on how best to manage problematic social media use.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Plackett R, Blyth A, Schartau P

The Impact of Social Media Use Interventions on Mental Well-Being: Systematic Review

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e44922

DOI: 10.2196/44922

PMID: 37565693

PMCID: 10457695

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.