Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Nov 24, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 24, 2022 - Jan 19, 2023
Date Accepted: Mar 25, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Practical Benefits, Challenges, and Recommendations on Social Media Recruitment: Multi-Stakeholder Interview Study

Goldman N, Willem T, Buyx A, Zimmermann BM

Practical Benefits, Challenges, and Recommendations on Social Media Recruitment: Multi-Stakeholder Interview Study

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e44587

DOI: 10.2196/44587

PMID: 37213177

PMCID: 10242465

Social media recruitment: practical benefits, challenges, and recommendations. A multi-stakeholder interview study.

  • Nina Goldman; 
  • Theresa Willem; 
  • Alena Buyx; 
  • Bettina M. Zimmermann

ABSTRACT

Background:

The increasing use of social media over time opens new opportunities for recruiting patients for research studies. However, systematic evaluations indicate that the success of social media recruitment in terms of cost-effectiveness and representativeness depends on the type of study and its purpose.

Objective:

This study aims to explore the practical benefits and challenges of recruiting study participants with social media in the context of clinical and non-clinical medical studies and provide a summary of expert advice on how to conduce social-media-based recruitment.

Methods:

We interviewed 6 Hepatitis B patients who use social media and/or have been in touch with social media recruitment and 30 experts from the following disciplines: (1) social media researchers or social scientists, (2) practical experts for SMR, (3) legal experts, (4) ethics committees’ members, and (5) members of the TherVacB consortium. The interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis and qualitative data analysis software (Atlas.ti 8.0).

Results:

Our findings indicate that there are diverging expert opinions regarding the challenges and benefits of social media recruitment for research studies especially in these four domains: (1) Resources needed; (2) Representativeness; (3) Online community building; (4) Privacy considerations. Despite these divergent opinions, the interviewed experts also provided detailed practical advice on how to promote a research study via social media, based on their own experiences and theoretical considerations.

Conclusions:

Even though recruitment strategies should always be study-specific, a multi-platform approach (recruiting via several different social media platforms) with mixed-methods recruitment (online and offline recruitment channels) is the most beneficial recruitment strategy for many research studies. The different recruiting methods complement each other and may contribute to increase the reach of the study, the recruitment accrual, and the representativeness of the sample. However, it is important to assess the context- and project-specific appropriateness and usefulness of social media recruitment before designing the recruitment strategy.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Goldman N, Willem T, Buyx A, Zimmermann BM

Practical Benefits, Challenges, and Recommendations on Social Media Recruitment: Multi-Stakeholder Interview Study

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e44587

DOI: 10.2196/44587

PMID: 37213177

PMCID: 10242465

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.