Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Nov 18, 2022
Date Accepted: May 4, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Wearable Sensor Technologies to Assess Motor Functions in People With Multiple Sclerosis: Systematic Scoping Review and Perspective

Woelfle T, Bourguignon L, Lorscheider J, Kappos L, Naegelin Y, Jutzeler CR

Wearable Sensor Technologies to Assess Motor Functions in People With Multiple Sclerosis: Systematic Scoping Review and Perspective

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e44428

DOI: 10.2196/44428

PMID: 37498655

PMCID: 10415952

Wearable Sensor Technologies to Assess Motor Functions in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Scoping Review and Perspective

  • Tim Woelfle; 
  • Lucie Bourguignon; 
  • Johannes Lorscheider; 
  • Ludwig Kappos; 
  • Yvonne Naegelin; 
  • Catherine Ruth Jutzeler

ABSTRACT

Background:

Wearable sensor technologies promise to improve monitoring in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and inform timely disease management decisions. Systematic evidence of the utility of wearable sensor technology in PwMS is accumulating but is generally limited to specific subgroups of patients (e.g., fallers vs. non-fallers), clinical or laboratory settings, and outcome categories (e.g., gait). As a result, most of the existing reviews and meta-analyses available so far only include a fraction of studies using sensor technologies and thus, providing a narrow and incomplete understanding of the clinical research landscape.

Objective:

Our aim was to provide a comprehensive overview of studies that have employed wearable sensors to assess, monitor, and quantify motor function in PwMS during daily activities or in a controlled laboratory setting.

Methods:

We systematically reviewed studies of wearable sensors to assess motor performance of PwMS according to PRISMA guidelines. We spanned PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science until March 22nd, 2021 considering "multiple sclerosis" associated with wearable search terms and included all studies assessing motor functions. After selection of the relevant studies, types of results were systematically mapped into nine predefined categories and the reporting quality was determined through nine questions.

Results:

Of 959 identified publications, 223 (129 [57.8%] in a real-world setting) were included, comprising 20’573 PwMS. Triaxial accelerometers were the most used sensor, mostly to assess physical activity in a real-world setting. A surge in sensors embedded in smartphones and smartwatches has been observed. Overall, the reporting quality was good.

Conclusions:

Despite a possible publication bias and a vast heterogeneity in the outcomes reported, our review provides an overview of the current literature of wearable sensor technologies used for PwMS and highlights shortcomings such as the lack of harmonization and transparency in reporting methods and results. Those limitations need to be addressed for the growing implementation of wearable sensor technologies in clinical routine and clinical trials, which is of utmost importance for further progress in clinical research and daily management for PwMS. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021243249.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Woelfle T, Bourguignon L, Lorscheider J, Kappos L, Naegelin Y, Jutzeler CR

Wearable Sensor Technologies to Assess Motor Functions in People With Multiple Sclerosis: Systematic Scoping Review and Perspective

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e44428

DOI: 10.2196/44428

PMID: 37498655

PMCID: 10415952

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.