Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Nov 16, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 16, 2022 - Jan 11, 2023
Date Accepted: Aug 3, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Use of Biological Feedback as a Health Behavior Change Technique in Adults: Scoping Review

Richardson KM, Jospe MR, Saleh AA, Clarke TN, Bedoya AR, Behrens N, Marano K, Cigan L, Liao Y, Scott ER, Guo JS, Aguinaga A, Schembre SM

Use of Biological Feedback as a Health Behavior Change Technique in Adults: Scoping Review

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e44359

DOI: 10.2196/44359

PMID: 37747766

PMCID: 10562972

Use of Biological Feedback as a Health Behavior Change Technique in Adults: A Scoping Review

  • Kelli M Richardson; 
  • Michelle R Jospe; 
  • Ahlam A Saleh; 
  • Thanatcha Nadia Clarke; 
  • Arianna R Bedoya; 
  • Nick Behrens; 
  • Kari Marano; 
  • Lacey Cigan; 
  • Yue Liao; 
  • Eric R Scott; 
  • Jessica S Guo; 
  • April Aguinaga; 
  • Susan M Schembre

ABSTRACT

Background:

Recent advances in personal biosensing technology support the shift from standardized to personalized health interventions, whereby biological data is used to motivate health behavior change. However, the implementation of interventions using biological feedback as a behavior change technique has not been comprehensively explored.

Objective:

The purpose of this review was to (1) map the domains of research where biological feedback has been used as a behavior change technique and (2) describe how it is implemented in behavior change interventions for adults.

Methods:

A comprehensive systematic search strategy was used to query multiple electronic databases in June 2021. Eligible studies were primary analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults that incorporated biological feedback as a behavior change technique. DistillerSR® was used to manage the literature search and review.

Results:

After removing 49,500 duplicates, 50,287 articles were screened, and 767 articles were included. The earliest RCT was published in 1972 with a notable increase in publications after 2000. Biological feedback was most used in RCTs aimed at preventing or managing diabetes (n=233, 30.4%), cardiovascular disease (n=175, 22.8%), and obesity (n=115, 15.0%). Feedback was often given on multiple biomarkers and targeted multiple health behaviors. The most common biomarkers used were anthropometric measures (n=297, 38.7%), blood pressure (n=238, 31.0%), and glucose (n=227, 29.6%). The most targeted behaviors were diet (n=472, 61.5%), physical activity (n=417, 54.4%), and smoking cessation (n=154, 20.1%). The frequency and type of communication by which biological feedback was provided varied by the method of biomarker measurement. Of the 493 (64.3%) studies where participants self-measured their biomarker, 476 (96.6%) received feedback multiple times over the intervention, and 468 (94.9%) received feedback through a biosensing device.

Conclusions:

Biological feedback is increasingly being used to motivate behavior change, particularly where relevant biomarkers can be readily assessed. Yet, the methods by which biological feedback is operationalized in intervention research varies, and its effectiveness remains unclear. This scoping review serves as the foundation for developing a guiding framework for effectively implementing biological feedback as a behavior change technique. Clinical Trial: https://osf.io/yp5wa


 Citation

Please cite as:

Richardson KM, Jospe MR, Saleh AA, Clarke TN, Bedoya AR, Behrens N, Marano K, Cigan L, Liao Y, Scott ER, Guo JS, Aguinaga A, Schembre SM

Use of Biological Feedback as a Health Behavior Change Technique in Adults: Scoping Review

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e44359

DOI: 10.2196/44359

PMID: 37747766

PMCID: 10562972

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.