Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Nov 11, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 11, 2022 - Jan 6, 2023
Date Accepted: Jan 23, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Implementing an Activity Tracker to Increase Motivation for Physical Activity in Diabetic Patients in Primary Care: a SWOT Analysis
ABSTRACT
Background:
Introduction: Many projects related to technology implementation in the context of chronic diseases were developed over the years in primary care to improve patient care. However, implementation in primary care remains challenging in primary care.
Objective:
Objectives: 1) To assess satisfaction among patients with type 2 diabetes using an activity tracker to increase motivation for physical activity and 2) to explore the team’s perception of this technology implementation in a primary care setting.
Methods:
Methods:
We conducted a hybrid type 1 study of 3-months in an Academic Primary Health Centre in Quebec City, Canada. The randomized pilot trial included two groups of 15 patients with type 2 diabetes (control and intervention). Alongside with randomized pilot trial, we performed a SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) to determine the components of successful technology implementation. Two questionnaires were used to gather feedback: A homemade satisfaction and acceptability questionnaire on an activity tracker (15 participants in the intervention group) and a questionnaire based on the SWOT elements (7 members of the research team and health professionals). Both questionnaires contained quantitative and qualitative questions. Qualitative variables from selected answers were reported in frequency tabs. Qualitative variables from open questions were synthesized in a matrix and ranked according to apparition frequency and global importance. A thematic analysis was performed by the first author and validated by two coauthors separately. The information gathered was triangulated to propose recommendations that were then approved by the team. Both quantitative (RCT participants) and qualitative (RCT participants and team) results were combined for recommendations.
Results:
Results:
In total, 86% of the participants were satisfied with their activity tracker use and 75% felt that it incited them to stick to their physical activity program. The main strengths of the team members’ perspectives were the study design, the team, and the device. The weaknesses were the budgetary constraints, the turnover, and the technical issues. The opportunities were the primary care setting and the common technology. The threats were recruitment, administrative challenges, and technological difficulties.
Conclusions:
Conclusion: Patients with type 2 diabetes were satisfied with their activity tracker used to improve motivation for physical activity. Research team members agreed that implementation can be done in primary care, but some challenges remain in using this technological tool in clinical practice regularly. Clinical Trial: NCT03709966
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.