Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Nov 9, 2022
Date Accepted: Dec 31, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Use of the Maslach Burnout Inventory Among Public Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review

Soares JP, Lopes RH, Mendonça PBdS, Silva CRDV, Rodrigues CCFM, Castro JLd

Use of the Maslach Burnout Inventory Among Public Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review

JMIR Ment Health 2023;10:e44195

DOI: 10.2196/44195

PMID: 37477960

PMCID: 10403803

Use of the Maslach Burnout Inventory among public health care professionals: a scoping review

  • Juliana Pontes Soares; 
  • Rayssa Horácio Lopes; 
  • Paula Beatriz de Souza Mendonça; 
  • Cícera Renata Diniz Vieira Silva; 
  • Cláudia Cristiane Filgueira Martins Rodrigues; 
  • Janete Lima de Castro

ABSTRACT

Background:

Work can be considered a source of living, well-being, and socioeconomic development. When the work environment negatively influences individuals, it may trigger emotional disturbances, behavioral problems, chronic stress conditions, and illnesses, such as burnout syndrome (BS). Recently, studies on BS increased and placed special focus on healthcare professionals. The prevalence of BS among health professionals is associated with their chronic exposure to human suffering and long working hours without proper rest. These factors have contributed to greater stress and high physical and emotional exhaustion levels.

Objective:

To identify and map studies using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) scale to identify burnout syndrome in health professionals working in public health services.

Methods:

This scoping review was developed based on the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Reviewers Manual and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The steps followed in this study were proposed by Arskey and O'Malley and Levac, Colquhoun, O'Brien: Identification of research question, Identification of potential studies, Study selection, Data extraction and imputation, Data analyses and interpretation, Consulation whith stakeholders. The detailed methodology was published in a protocol.

Results:

Fifty-five articles were identified after screening and eligibility criteria, published between 1999 and 2021 from 32 countries. Most reports were published in Brazil, Spain, and China. Twenty-two versions of the MBI were identified, presenting different items, scores, and cut-off points. The included studies had recommendations and implications for clinical practice. The consultation with stakeholders allowed knowledge translation to those interested in BS.

Conclusions:

Studies mostly included physicians, and the original version of MBI was predominantly used. Divergences in BS classification were highlighted, which may be related to MBI cross-cultural adaptations and applications in other countries. This study contributes to advance research regarding burnout syndrome as an occupational illness since it has harmful consequences for workers, healthcare services, and the quality of care provided to the population.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Soares JP, Lopes RH, Mendonça PBdS, Silva CRDV, Rodrigues CCFM, Castro JLd

Use of the Maslach Burnout Inventory Among Public Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review

JMIR Ment Health 2023;10:e44195

DOI: 10.2196/44195

PMID: 37477960

PMCID: 10403803

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.