Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Nov 10, 2022
Date Accepted: Mar 8, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Mapping Inequities in Digital Health Technology Within the World Health Organization’s European Region Using PROGRESS PLUS: Scoping Review

Woolley KE, Bright D, Ayres T, Morgan FM, Little K, Davies AR

Mapping Inequities in Digital Health Technology Within the World Health Organization’s European Region Using PROGRESS PLUS: Scoping Review

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e44181

DOI: 10.2196/44181

PMID: 37115613

PMCID: 10182469

Mapping inequities in digital health technology within the World Health Organization’s European Region using PROGRESS PLUS: a scoping review

  • Katherine E. Woolley; 
  • Diana Bright; 
  • Toby Ayres; 
  • Fiona M. Morgan; 
  • Kirsty Little; 
  • Alisha R. Davies

ABSTRACT

Background:

The use of patient-facing digital technologies within healthcare rapidly increased as services transferred to online platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Inequalities in digital health across the domains of equity are not routinely examined, yet the longer-term integration of digitally delivered services needs to take into account such inequalities to ensure equitable benefit.

Objective:

The aim of this scoping review was to map inequities in access, use and engagement with digital health technologies, across equity domains.

Methods:

We searched 4 electronic databases (MEDLINE, ASSIA, PsycINFO, Scopus) for published quantitative and mixed methods reviews and meta-analyses published between Jan 2016-May 2022. Reviews were limited to those that included studies from the World Health Organization’s European region. Extracted data was mapped against Cochrane’s PROGRESS PLUS dimensions of equity.

Results:

Four hundred and four unique citations were identified from the searches and two citations from other sources. After eligibility assessment, 22 reviews were included. Consistent evidence was found showing higher access to digital health technologies among patients who were of white ethnicity, English- speaking and with no disability. There were no reviews that explored differences in access to digital healthcare by age, gender/sex, occupation, education, or homeless/substance misuse. Higher use of digital health technologies was observed amongst populations which were white, English-speaking, younger in age, with higher level of education, of higher economic status and resident in urban areas. No clear evidence of differences in use of digital technologies by occupation, gender/sex, disability, or homeless/substance misuse was found. Nor was clear evidence found in the included reviews on inequalities in the engagement with digital technologies. Finally, no reviews were identified that explored differences by place of residence.

Conclusions:

Despite awareness of the potential impact of inequalities in digital health, there are important evidence gaps across multiple equity domains. The development of a common framework for evaluating digital health equity in new health initiatives, and consistency in reporting findings is needed.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Woolley KE, Bright D, Ayres T, Morgan FM, Little K, Davies AR

Mapping Inequities in Digital Health Technology Within the World Health Organization’s European Region Using PROGRESS PLUS: Scoping Review

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e44181

DOI: 10.2196/44181

PMID: 37115613

PMCID: 10182469

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.