Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Dermatology

Date Submitted: Nov 1, 2022
Date Accepted: Jan 16, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Demographic Data Associated With Digital Inequity Reported in Patient-to-Provider Teledermatology Studies in the United States From 2011 to 2021: Scoping Review

Miller J, Ioffreda P, Nugent S, Jones E

Demographic Data Associated With Digital Inequity Reported in Patient-to-Provider Teledermatology Studies in the United States From 2011 to 2021: Scoping Review

JMIR Dermatol 2023;6:e43983

DOI: 10.2196/43983

PMID: 36938315

PMCID: 10012205

Demographic data associated with digital inequity reported in patient-to-provider teledermatology studies in the United States from 2011 to 2021: a scoping review

  • John Miller; 
  • Patrick Ioffreda; 
  • Shannon Nugent; 
  • Elizabeth Jones

ABSTRACT

Background:

Patient-to-provider teledermatology relies on a patient’s access to technology to ensure a successful visit. However, access to broadband internet and technology varies between populations in the United States – leading to the digital divide. While teledermatology has been recognized as a model to improve access, little is known about how often demographic data associated with digital inequity is captured in studies.

Objective:

To characterize how often demographic data associated with digital inequity is reported in patient-to-provider teledermatology studies.

Methods:

A scoping literature review search was conducted using search term teledermatology for the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. All studies published between December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2021 that evaluated patient-to-provider teledermatology were eligible.

Results:

1412 publications describing teledermatology were identified, of which 46 met the inclusion criteria. Race or ethnicity was the most frequently reported demographic characteristic (61%). However, only 41% of studies were representative of race or ethnicity, defined as including > 20% non-white participants. Studies rarely reported participants greater than 65 years old (30%), preferred language (20%), income (13%), highest level of education (11%), or access to a device (9%). Studies conducted after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic were significantly more likely to report preferred language and appeared more likely to report other demographic data associated with digital inequity without reaching statistical significance.

Conclusions:

Demographic data associated with digital inequity is rarely reported in patient-to-provider teledermatology studies to-date. These studies frequently lack adequate representation of racial and ethnic minorities. Demographic data associated with digital inequity should be reported in teledermatology studies to advance inclusive research methodologies and ensure generalizable conclusions.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Miller J, Ioffreda P, Nugent S, Jones E

Demographic Data Associated With Digital Inequity Reported in Patient-to-Provider Teledermatology Studies in the United States From 2011 to 2021: Scoping Review

JMIR Dermatol 2023;6:e43983

DOI: 10.2196/43983

PMID: 36938315

PMCID: 10012205

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.