Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Oct 7, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 7, 2022 - Dec 2, 2022
Date Accepted: Feb 26, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Experiences of Using an Electronic Health Tool Among Health Care Professionals Involved in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Management: Qualitative Analysis

Nyberg A, Sondell A, Lundell S, Marklund S, Tistad M, Wadell K

Experiences of Using an Electronic Health Tool Among Health Care Professionals Involved in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Management: Qualitative Analysis

JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e43269

DOI: 10.2196/43269

PMID: 36995743

PMCID: 10131608

Experiences of using an electronic health tool among healthcare professionals involved in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease management: a qualitative analysis

  • AndrĂ© Nyberg; 
  • Anna Sondell; 
  • Sara Lundell; 
  • Sarah Marklund; 
  • Malin Tistad; 
  • Karin Wadell

ABSTRACT

Background:

Although electronic health (eHealth) tools are seen as a promising way of delivering health services in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management, knowledge is scarce on the experience of using eHealth tools from the perspective of the healthcare professionals involved in COPD management in daily clinical praxis.

Objective:

The study explored the experiences of using an eHealth tool among healthcare professionals that worked with patients with COPD in daily clinical practice.

Methods:

Semi-structured interviews were performed with ten healthcare professionals three and twelve months after accessing the COPD Web, an eHealth tool. Data from the interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis with an inductive approach.

Results:

The main results reflected healthcare professionals’ experiences in three categories: receiving competence support and adjusting practice, improving quality of care, and efforts required for implementation. These categories highlight that using an eHealth tool such as the COPD Web was experienced to provide knowledge support for healthcare professionals, leading to adaptation and facilitation of working procedures and person-centered care, and, taken together, improving quality of care through enhanced patient contact and encouragement of interprofessional collaboration. In addition, healthcare professionals expressed that patients using the COPD Web were better equipped to tackle their disease and adhered better to provided treatment, increasing their self-management ability. However, structural and external barriers bar the successful implementation of an eHealth tool in daily praxis. Time, support, and education are needed to tackle these barriers.

Conclusions:

The results of this study indicate that the use of an eHealth tool among healthcare professionals involved in COPD management improves quality of care and enables competence support and clinical practice adjustment, but efforts are required before an eHealth tool can be successfully implemented. Clinical Trial: NCT02696187


 Citation

Please cite as:

Nyberg A, Sondell A, Lundell S, Marklund S, Tistad M, Wadell K

Experiences of Using an Electronic Health Tool Among Health Care Professionals Involved in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Management: Qualitative Analysis

JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e43269

DOI: 10.2196/43269

PMID: 36995743

PMCID: 10131608

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.