Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Sep 6, 2022
Date Accepted: Dec 5, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Nurses’ Perceptions of Climate Change: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Diallo T, Bérubé A, Roberge M, Audate PP, Larente-Marcotte S, Jobin Ã, Moubarak N, Guillaumie L, Dupéré S, Guichard A, Goupil-Sormany I

Nurses’ Perceptions of Climate Change: Protocol for a Scoping Review

JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e42516

DOI: 10.2196/42516

PMID: 36630170

PMCID: 9878363

Nurses’ perceptions of climate change: A scoping review protocol

  • Thierno Diallo; 
  • Anouk Bérubé; 
  • Martin Roberge; 
  • Pierre-Paul Audate; 
  • Stéphanie Larente-Marcotte; 
  • Édith Jobin; 
  • Nisrine Moubarak; 
  • Laurence Guillaumie; 
  • Sophie Dupéré; 
  • Anne Guichard; 
  • Isabelle Goupil-Sormany

ABSTRACT

Background:

Climate change is a major health issue and nurses need to be involved in combating it at both the individual and collective levels. A few recent studies have embarked on the process of examining the perceptions of these health professionals relative to climate change, but there is still very little known about this subject and no study has conducted an exploratory review of the literature on nurses' perceptions of this phenomenon.

Objective:

The purpose of this protocol is to develop a research strategy for an exploratory review of the literature focused on identifying nurses' perceptions of climate change.

Methods:

Firstly, with the help of a specialized librarian, we defined keywords and their combinations using an iterative process, to develop a documentary search strategy. This strategy was tested in four bibliographic databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science. The next step will be for two members of our research team to carry out a two-stage selection process using the online systematic review software Covidence. They will carry out this selection process independently, with the aim of identifying relevant studies that meet the inclusion criteria for our exploratory review. Finally, data on year of publication, authors, geographic area, article type, study objectives, methodology, and key findings will be extracted from selected articles for analysis. A search of the grey literature will be conducted to supplement the results of the bibliographic database search.

Results:

The findings should make it possible to more clearly define nurses' perceptions of climate change, as well as the role they can play and what they need to be able to bring forward solutions to this phenomenon. The findings should also serve to guide the health sector's interventions aimed at preparing its professionals for the potential threats of climate change.

Conclusions:

This study will open up new research perspectives on how to equip nurses to better integrate a response to climate change issues into their professional practice. Clinical Trial: Not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Diallo T, Bérubé A, Roberge M, Audate PP, Larente-Marcotte S, Jobin Ã, Moubarak N, Guillaumie L, Dupéré S, Guichard A, Goupil-Sormany I

Nurses’ Perceptions of Climate Change: Protocol for a Scoping Review

JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e42516

DOI: 10.2196/42516

PMID: 36630170

PMCID: 9878363

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.