Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Aug 29, 2022
Date Accepted: May 12, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Usability and Acceptability of Clinical Dashboards in Aged Care: Systematic Review

Siette J, Dodds L, Sharifi F, Nguyen A, Baysari M, Seaman K, Raban M, Wabe N, Westbrook J

Usability and Acceptability of Clinical Dashboards in Aged Care: Systematic Review

JMIR Aging 2023;6:e42274

DOI: 10.2196/42274

PMID: 37335599

PMCID: 10334718

Usability and acceptability of clinical dashboards in aged care: a systematic review

  • Joyce Siette; 
  • Laura Dodds; 
  • Fariba Sharifi; 
  • Amy Nguyen; 
  • Melissa Baysari; 
  • Karla Seaman; 
  • Magdalena Raban; 
  • Nasir Wabe; 
  • Johanna Westbrook

ABSTRACT

Background:

The use of clinical dashboards in aged care systems to support performance review and improve resident outcomes is increasing.

Objective:

Our aim was to explore evidence from studies of the acceptability and usability of clinical dashboards including their visual features and functionalities in aged care settings.

Methods:

A systematic review was conducted using five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and CINAHL) from inception to April 2022. Studies were included in the review if they were conducted in aged care environments (home-based community care, retirement villages and long-term care) and reported a usability or acceptability evaluation of a clinical dashboard for use in aged care environments, including specific dashboard visual features (e.g., a qualitative summary of individual user experience or metrics from a usability scale). Two researchers independently reviewed the articles and extracted the data. Data synthesis was performed via narrative review and the risk of bias was measured using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

Results:

14 articles reporting on 12 dashboards were included. The quality of the articles varied. There was considerable heterogeneity in implementation setting (home care, 57.1%), dashboard user groups (health professionals, 63.6%), and sample size (range 3-292). Dashboard features included a visual representation of information (e.g., medical condition prevalence), analytic capability (e.g., predictive) and others (e.g., stakeholder communication). Dashboard usability was mixed (4 dashboards rated as high), and dashboard acceptability was high for 9 dashboards. Most users considered dashboards to be informative, relevant, and functional, highlighting the utility and intention of using this resource in the future. Dashboards that had the presence of one or more of these features (bar charts, radio buttons, check boxes or other symbols, interactive displays, reporting capabilities) were found to be highly acceptable.

Conclusions:

A comprehensive summary of clinical dashboards used in aged care is provided to inform future dashboard development, testing and implementation. Further research is required to optimise visualisation features, usability and acceptability of dashboards in aged care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Siette J, Dodds L, Sharifi F, Nguyen A, Baysari M, Seaman K, Raban M, Wabe N, Westbrook J

Usability and Acceptability of Clinical Dashboards in Aged Care: Systematic Review

JMIR Aging 2023;6:e42274

DOI: 10.2196/42274

PMID: 37335599

PMCID: 10334718

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.