Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Aug 25, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 25, 2022 - Oct 20, 2022
Date Accepted: Nov 8, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Exploring the Cross-cultural Acceptability of Digital Tools for Pain Self-reporting: Qualitative Study

Ali SM, Lee RR, McBeth J, James B, McAlister S, Chiarotto A, Dixon WG, van der Veer SN

Exploring the Cross-cultural Acceptability of Digital Tools for Pain Self-reporting: Qualitative Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e42177

DOI: 10.2196/42177

PMID: 36753324

PMCID: 9947768

Exploring the Cross-Cultural Acceptability of Digital Tools for Pain Self-reporting: A Qualitative Study

  • Syed Mustafa Ali; 
  • Rebecca R Lee; 
  • John McBeth; 
  • Ben James; 
  • Sean McAlister; 
  • Alessandro Chiarotto; 
  • William G Dixon; 
  • Sabine N van der Veer

ABSTRACT

Background:

Culture and ethnicity influence how people communicate about their pain. This makes it challenging to develop pain self-report tools that are acceptable across ethnic groups.

Objective:

We aimed to inform the development of cross-culturally acceptable digital pain self-report tools by better understanding similarities and differences between ethnic groups in pain experiences and self-reporting needs.

Methods:

Three online workshops, consisting of a focus group and a user requirement exercise, with people who self-identified as being of black African (n=6), Southeast Asian (n=10), or white British (n=7) ethnicity were conducted.

Results:

Across ethnic groups, participants shared similar lived experiences and challenges in communicating their pain to healthcare professionals. However, there were differences in beliefs about the causes of pain, attitudes towards pain medication, and experiences of how stigma and gender norms influenced pain reporting behaviour. Despite these differences, they agreed on important aspects for pain self-report, but participants from non-white backgrounds had additional language requirements, such as culturally appropriate pain terminologies, to reduce self-reporting barriers.

Conclusions:

To improve the cross-cultural acceptability and equity of digital pain self-report tools, future developments should address these differences between ethnic groups in pain perceptions and beliefs, factors influencing pain reporting behaviour, and language requirements.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ali SM, Lee RR, McBeth J, James B, McAlister S, Chiarotto A, Dixon WG, van der Veer SN

Exploring the Cross-cultural Acceptability of Digital Tools for Pain Self-reporting: Qualitative Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e42177

DOI: 10.2196/42177

PMID: 36753324

PMCID: 9947768

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.