Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Aug 8, 2022
Date Accepted: Nov 27, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Clinical Efficacy of Mobile App–Based, Self-Directed Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Chung C, Lee JW, Lee SW, Jo MW

Clinical Efficacy of Mobile App–Based, Self-Directed Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e41753

DOI: 10.2196/41753

PMID: 38179689

PMCID: 10786334

Clinical Efficacy of Mobile Application-based Self-directed Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Chiwook Chung; 
  • Jong Won Lee; 
  • Sei Won Lee; 
  • Min-Woo Jo

ABSTRACT

Background:

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is well known to improve clinical symptoms in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Recently, mobile application-based PR have become available in clinical practice. We investigated the outcomes of mobile application-based PR in patients with COPD.

Objective:

The objective of our study was to evaluate clinical efficacy of mobile application-based PR compared with conventional center-based PR in patients with COPD.

Methods:

A systematic literature search was performed using Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL to identify relevant randomized controlled trials in patients with COPD. The meta-analysis evaluated mean differences (MD) in the 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and risk ratio (RR) of hospitalization from exacerbation.

Results:

Of the 835 screened studies, eight studies were included in the systematic review and seven in the meta-analysis. Four studies assessed 6MWD with a MD of 6.97 (95% confidence interval [CI] –7.93 to 21.87). Four studies assessed CAT score with a MD of –1.28 (95% CI –3.04 to 0.49). Three studies assessed mMRC dyspnea scale with a MD of –0.08 (95% CI –0.29 to 0.13). Two studies assessed SGRQ with a MD of –3.62 (95% CI –9.62 to 2.38). Three studies assessed hospitalization from exacerbation with a RR of 0.65 (95% CI 0.27 to 1.53). These clinical parameters generally favored mobile application-based PR, although not statistically significantly.

Conclusions:

Mobile application-based PR showed comparable clinical outcomes to conventional PR in patients with COPD. Mobile application-based PR may be a useful treatment option when conventional PR is not feasible.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Chung C, Lee JW, Lee SW, Jo MW

Clinical Efficacy of Mobile App–Based, Self-Directed Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e41753

DOI: 10.2196/41753

PMID: 38179689

PMCID: 10786334

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.