Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Aug 4, 2022
Date Accepted: Nov 30, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Factors Influencing Community Participation in Internet Interventions Compared With Research Trials: Observational Study in a Nationally Representative Adult Cohort

Batterham P, Gulliver A, Sunderland M, Farrer L, Kay-Lambkin F, Trias A, Calear A

Factors Influencing Community Participation in Internet Interventions Compared With Research Trials: Observational Study in a Nationally Representative Adult Cohort

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e41663

DOI: 10.2196/41663

PMID: 36729613

PMCID: 9936370

Factors influencing community participation in internet interventions compared with research trials: Observational study in a nationally representative adult cohort

  • Philip Batterham; 
  • Amelia Gulliver; 
  • Matthew Sunderland; 
  • Louise Farrer; 
  • Frances Kay-Lambkin; 
  • Angelica Trias; 
  • Alison Calear

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital mental health (DMH) programs can be effective in treating and preventing mental health problems. However, community engagement with these programs can be poor. Understanding the barriers and enablers of DMH program use may assist in identifying ways to increase uptake of these programs, which have the potential to provide broad-scale prevention and treatment in the community.

Objective:

To identify and compare factors that may influence participation in DMH programs in practice and in research trials, identify any respondent characteristics that are associated with these factors, and assess the relationship between intentions to use DMH programs and actual uptake.

Methods:

Australian adults aged 18 years and older were recruited from market research panels to participate in the study. The sample was representative of the Australian adult population based on age, gender and location. Participants completed a cross-sectional online survey assessing demographic characteristics, mental health symptom measures, attitudes and use of digital mental health (DMH) programs in practice and in research studies, and the factors influencing use in both settings.

Results:

Across both research and practice, trust in the organisation delivering the service or trial was the top ranked factor influencing participation, followed by anonymity or privacy and having adequate information. There was little variation in rankings across demographic groups, intentions to use DMH programs or mental health status. Usage intentions were a strong predictor of both current and past behaviour.

Conclusions:

Efforts to increase uptake of DMH programs or participation in research trials should focus on clearly communicating to users the legitimacy of the organisation delivering the program, the security and use of participant data and the effectiveness of DMH programs.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Batterham P, Gulliver A, Sunderland M, Farrer L, Kay-Lambkin F, Trias A, Calear A

Factors Influencing Community Participation in Internet Interventions Compared With Research Trials: Observational Study in a Nationally Representative Adult Cohort

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e41663

DOI: 10.2196/41663

PMID: 36729613

PMCID: 9936370

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.