Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: iProceedings

Date Submitted: Jul 31, 2022
Date Accepted: Jun 19, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effectiveness of Telegenetic Counseling for Patients and Families With Suspected Hereditary Cancer: Systematic Review

SHIBUYA Y, HARADA T, AOKI M, OTA E, KAMEI T

Effectiveness of Telegenetic Counseling for Patients and Families With Suspected Hereditary Cancer: Systematic Review

iProc 2023;9:e41565

DOI: 10.2196/41565

Effectiveness of Telegenetic Counseling for Patients and Families with Suspected Hereditary Cancer: A Systematic Review

  • Yuriko SHIBUYA; 
  • Tomoyo HARADA; 
  • Mikiko AOKI; 
  • Erika OTA; 
  • Tomoko KAMEI

ABSTRACT

Background:

Telegenetic counseling has attracted attention as a preventive measure against recent COVID-19 pandemic. This systematic review compared telegenetic counseling using videoconferencing versus face-to-face counseling in the hereditary cancer.

Objective:

To evaluate the effectiveness of telegenetic counselling using videoconferencing versus face-to-face counseling for people with suspected hereditary cancer.

Methods:

A comprehensive literature search was carried out in December 2021 using databases of the Japan Medical Abstracts Society, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and the Cochran Library. The eligibility criteria were studies in which RCTs or cluster RCTs were conducted on patients with suspected hereditary cancer and their families, comparing telegenetic counseling using videoconferencing with face-to-face genetic counseling. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias of each RCT study. This study was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)

Results:

Two studies comprising a total of 206 participants were finalized and used for meta-analysis. Participants were individuals who lived in rural areas or in areas without genetic counselors who were suspected of having breast cancer, colon cancer, ovarian cancer, multiple cancer and genetic cancer. The rate of genetic tests was significantly higher in the intervention group (Risk Ratio = 1.08: 95% CI: 0.79 to 1.49; I2 = 45%). Other outcomes were assessed in only one study and their effects could not be discussed explicitly. The risk of bias was high in both studies, with a high risk of performance bias, detection bias, and attrition bias.

Conclusions:

The results demonstrated that remote genetic counselling may increase the rate of post-counselling tests compared with face-to-face counselling. However, the evidence is limited because of the small number of RCT studies on telegenetic counseling and a high risk of bias. Further accumulation of studies is needed in the future.


 Citation

Please cite as:

SHIBUYA Y, HARADA T, AOKI M, OTA E, KAMEI T

Effectiveness of Telegenetic Counseling for Patients and Families With Suspected Hereditary Cancer: Systematic Review

iProc 2023;9:e41565

DOI: 10.2196/41565

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.