Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: iProceedings

Date Submitted: Jul 27, 2022
Date Accepted: Aug 19, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Measuring Client Satisfaction With Digital Services: Validity and Reliability of a Short-Form Digital Tool

Pedersen H, Havnen A, Lara-Cabrera ML

Measuring Client Satisfaction With Digital Services: Validity and Reliability of a Short-Form Digital Tool

iProc 2022;8(1):e41472

DOI: 10.2196/41472

Measuring the client satisfaction with digital services: Validity and reliability of a short-form digital tool

  • Henrik Pedersen; 
  • Audun Havnen; 
  • Mariela Loreto Lara-Cabrera

ABSTRACT

Background:

Because of the COVID-19 pandemic preventive measures, mental health care services were forced to reorganize and developed remote telehealth services. This led to include newer modes of receiving treatment, both internet-based and video-based therapies, to meet the patients’ need for help, while at the same time keeping the COVID-19 pandemic under control. This shift calls for evaluation of the patient experience during times of increased use of novel approaches of receiving treatment. Brief evaluation forms are ideal for this purpose.

Objective:

As there are no validated brief measures tools to evaluate patient-reported experiences in Norwegian mental health settings, we aimed to explore the internal consistency, and factor validity of the 4-item self-administrated Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-4).

Methods:

We examined the internal consistency and factor structure of a brief digitally administrated patient satisfaction measure in a sample of 145 outpatients in Norwegian mental health settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results:

The Internal consistency of a digital Norwegian CSQ-4 was high, with a Cronbach’s alpha of .92. A clear unidimensional structure (Eigenvalue = 3.22), which explained 80.4% of the variance, emerged from our data. A Mann-Whitney U-test found a non-significant difference in satisfaction between genders (U = 2546.5, p = .166). A spearman’s rank correlation between satisfaction and age in our data was not statistically significant, r (144) = .110, p = .189.

Conclusions:

A measurement tool such as the CSQ-4 would be a valuable resource to improve the development and application of digital mental health services. Our results may support the use of the Norwegian CSQ-4 as a valid and reliable measure of satisfaction with mental healthcare services. In addition, as the CSQ-4 is short and generic tool, it can be implemented in a wide range of routine evaluation of patient reported satisfaction with telehealth services.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Pedersen H, Havnen A, Lara-Cabrera ML

Measuring Client Satisfaction With Digital Services: Validity and Reliability of a Short-Form Digital Tool

iProc 2022;8(1):e41472

DOI: 10.2196/41472

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.