Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Aug 7, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 25, 2022 - Sep 19, 2022
Date Accepted: Mar 28, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

User-Initiated Symptom Assessment With an Electronic Symptom Checker: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Validation Study

Liu VDM, Kaila M, Koskela T

User-Initiated Symptom Assessment With an Electronic Symptom Checker: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Validation Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e41423

DOI: 10.2196/41423

PMID: 37467041

PMCID: 10398552

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

User initiated symptom assessment with an electronic symptom checker. Study protocol for mixed-methods validation.

  • Ville Dan Mikael Liu; 
  • Minna Kaila; 
  • Tuomas Koskela

ABSTRACT

Background:

National Omaolo digital services include symptom checkers in Finland. Users of these services can do their triage with the help of questions from the reasoning tree of the symptom checkers. As a result of completing the symptom checker, the user receives a recommendation of action and a service assessment with appropriate guidance regarding their health problems to a specific symptom. This allows users to be provided with healthcare services regardless of time and place.

Objective:

This study describes the protocol for the mixed methods validation process of the 15 symptom checkers available in Omaolo digital services.

Methods:

This is a three-part mixed methods study using quantitative and qualitative methods. The first (qualitative validation study) and second study (quantitative clinical validation study) will be part of the clinical validation process that takes place in primary healthcare centers in Finland. Each organization provides a space where the study and the nurse triage can be done, in order to include an unscreened target population of users. The primary healthcare units included in this study provide walk-in model services, where no mandatory prior phone call or contact is required. Finally, in the third part (validation with case vignettes study), the use of case vignettes will be incorporated to supplement the triage accuracy of some of the Omaolo symptom checkers. Vignettes are produced from a variety of clinical sources, including material used in the exams of medical students. These vignettes test symptom checkers, in different triage levels, using one standardized patient case example.

Results:

A total of 964 clinical user filled symptom checker assessments were available, of which, 877 cases meet the requirements for clinical validation studies. The goal of sufficient data has been reached for most of the symptom checkers. Data collection was completed at the end of December 2020, and the first feasibility and user experience results were published at the end of 2020. Case vignettes have been identified and are to be completed before further testing the symptom checkers.

Conclusions:

The primary goals of this multimethod electronic symptom checker study are to assess safety, and to provide crucial information regarding the accuracy and usability of the Omaolo electronic symptom checkers. To the best of our knowledge this will be the first study to include real-life setting clinical cases along with case vignettes. Study results will be made publicly available through reports and open-access journal publications.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Liu VDM, Kaila M, Koskela T

User-Initiated Symptom Assessment With an Electronic Symptom Checker: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Validation Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e41423

DOI: 10.2196/41423

PMID: 37467041

PMCID: 10398552

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.