Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR AI

Date Submitted: Jul 11, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 30, 2022 - Nov 30, 2022
Date Accepted: Jun 2, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Real-Time Classification of Causes of Death Using AI: Sensitivity Analysis

Pita Ferreira P, Godinho Simões D, Pinto de Carvalho C, Duarte F, Fernandes E, Casaca P, Loff J, Soares AP, Albuquerque MJ, Pinto-Leite P, Peralta-Santos A

Real-Time Classification of Causes of Death Using AI: Sensitivity Analysis

JMIR AI 2023;2:e40965

DOI: 10.2196/40965

PMID: 38875558

PMCID: 11041420

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Real-time classification of causes of death using Artificial Intelligence: sensitivity analysis

  • Patricia Pita Ferreira; 
  • Diogo Godinho Simões; 
  • Constança Pinto de Carvalho; 
  • Francisco Duarte; 
  • Eugénia Fernandes; 
  • Pedro Casaca; 
  • José Loff; 
  • Ana Paula Soares; 
  • Maria João Albuquerque; 
  • Pedro Pinto-Leite; 
  • André Peralta-Santos

ABSTRACT

Background:

In 2021, European Union registered over 365,000 excess deaths, with over 16,000 excess deaths in Portugal. The Portuguese Directorate-General of Health (DGS) has developed a deep neural network – AUTOCOD – that codifies primary causes of death by analyzing the free text in the physicians' death certificates (DC). Although the performance of AUTOCOD has already been demonstrated, it was not clear if this performance was the same over time, especially during excess mortality periods.

Objective:

Determine the sensitivity of AUTOCOD for classifying the underlying cause of death compared with manual coding to ascertain the specific causes of death, in periods of excess mortality.

Methods:

We included all the DC between 2016 and 2019. We evaluated the performance of AUTOCOD through a confusion matrix, comparing ICD-10 classifications of DC by AUTOCOD with those from the human coders at DGS (gold-standard). Next, we compared the periods without excess mortality with periods of excess, severe and extreme excess mortality. Lastly, we repeated the analyses for the three most common ICD-10 chapters, targeting classification at the block level.

Results:

AUTOCOD showed high sensitivity (≥0.75) for ten ICD-10 chapters studied, with values above 0.90 for the more prevalent chapters (II – neoplasms; IX – diseases of the circulatory system; X – diseases of the respiratory system). These high sensitivity values show no significant differences when comparing the periods without excess mortality with periods of excess, severe and extreme excess mortality. When considering the ICD-10 block classification of the three most common ICD-10 chapters, AUTOCOD again performed well, showing high sensitivity (≥0.75) for 13 ICD-10 blocks, with no significant differences between periods without excess mortality and periods with excess mortality.

Conclusions:

Our results suggest that even during periods of excess and extreme excess mortality, the performance of AUTOCOD is not affected by a potential loss in text quality due to pressure on health services. Thus, AUTOCOD can be reliably used for real-time specific-cause mortality surveillance even in extreme excess mortality.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Pita Ferreira P, Godinho Simões D, Pinto de Carvalho C, Duarte F, Fernandes E, Casaca P, Loff J, Soares AP, Albuquerque MJ, Pinto-Leite P, Peralta-Santos A

Real-Time Classification of Causes of Death Using AI: Sensitivity Analysis

JMIR AI 2023;2:e40965

DOI: 10.2196/40965

PMID: 38875558

PMCID: 11041420

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.