Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Serious Games
Date Submitted: Jun 20, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 20, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022
Date Accepted: Oct 31, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Differences in Brain Activity and Body Movements between Virtual Reality and Offline Exercise: A Randomized Crossover Trial
ABSTRACT
Background:
Virtual reality has been suggested to be effective in enhancing physical exercise because of its immersive characteristics. However, few studies quantitatively assessed motion and brain activity during virtual reality exercises.
Objective:
We hypothesized that virtual reality could stimulate body movement and brain activity more effectively than standard exercise and that increased body movements in virtual reality exercise would be associated with orbitofrontal activation.
Methods:
A randomized crossover trial was conducted to compare exercises with virtual reality and without. Twenty-four healthy males performed the same motions when exercising with and without virtual reality, and the recorded videos were used for motion analysis. Hemodynamic changes in the prefrontal cortex were assessed using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.
Results:
There were significant differences in the total angle (z=-2.31, P=.015), length (z=-2.78, P=.005), calorie consumption (z=-3.04, P=.002), and change in accumulated oxygenated hemoglobin within the right orbitofrontal cortex (F=9.36, P=.003) between the virtual reality and offline trials. Hemodynamic changes in the right orbitofrontal cortex were positively correlated with both the total angle (r=0.45, P=.001) and length (r=0.38, P=.007) in the virtual reality exercise, whereas there was no significant correlation in the offline trial.
Conclusions:
The results of this study suggest that virtual reality exercise is effective in increasing the range of motion in healthy individuals, in relation to orbitofrontal activation.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.