Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Dermatology

Date Submitted: May 31, 2022
Date Accepted: Jan 3, 2023
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 26, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Refusal of Retreatment With Topical 5-Fluorouracil Among Patients With Actinic Keratosis: Qualitative Analysis

Singh R, McCain S, Grada A, Feldman SR

Refusal of Retreatment With Topical 5-Fluorouracil Among Patients With Actinic Keratosis: Qualitative Analysis

JMIR Dermatol 2023;6:e39988

DOI: 10.2196/39988

PMID: 37632916

PMCID: 10335144

Patients who refuse retreatment topical 5-fluoruoracil: a qualitative analysis.

  • Rohan Singh; 
  • Sarah McCain; 
  • Ayman Grada; 
  • Steven R Feldman

ABSTRACT

Background:

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a common premalignant skin lesion and topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is commonly used field-directed therapy. However, 5-FU is associated with frequent local skin reactions.

Objective:

To qualitatively assess experience in those who refuse treatment with 5-FU.

Methods:

Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 10 adult participants who had received treatment with 5-FU for AK between 1/1/2017 and 1/1/2020 and refused future treatment with 5-FU. Results were analyzed using qualitative research methods.

Results:

Although most participants had low concern when receiving a diagnosis of AK, most felt treatment was very important. When initiating treatment with 5-FU, most cited the recommendation by their healthcare professional as the primary motivator and initially had low concern with treatment. Most participants experienced difficulty with the physical burden of treatment, which caused lifestyle adjustments and a negative psychosocial impact. After treatment, most did not believe their HCP prepared them for treatment or were unsure. While half the participants felt 5-FU helped treat AKs, half were either unsure, due to premature discontinuation, or did not think 5-FU treated their AKs.

Conclusions:

5-FU is one of the most commonly prescribed treatments for AKs. Although participants considered treatment important, most considered the side effects of 5-FU were not worth the benefits, and most experienced both a physical and psychosocial burden secondary to treatment. Moreover, participants were either unsure or were not adequately prepared for treatment. Although our study was limited by input from participants who refused future treatment with 5-FU, most stated they would still continue to seek treatment for AKs in the future, and would consider other topical treatments, especially if associated with a milder AE profile. Non-adherence to treatment is a major cause of resistant disease and is a major hurdle in the treatment of skin conditions. Inability to assess efficacy due to premature discontinuation secondary to 5-FU related AEs was a common theme in our cohort. Counseling patients on the benefits and risks of a medication, in addition to therapeutic alternatives, may increase adherence and improve outcomes.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Singh R, McCain S, Grada A, Feldman SR

Refusal of Retreatment With Topical 5-Fluorouracil Among Patients With Actinic Keratosis: Qualitative Analysis

JMIR Dermatol 2023;6:e39988

DOI: 10.2196/39988

PMID: 37632916

PMCID: 10335144

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.