Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: May 26, 2022
Date Accepted: Aug 30, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Factors Influencing Older Adults’ Decisions Surrounding Adoption of Technology: Quantitative Experimental Study

Moxley J, Sharit J, Czaja SJ

The Factors Influencing Older Adults’ Decisions Surrounding Adoption of Technology: Quantitative Experimental Study

JMIR Aging 2022;5(4):e39890

DOI: 10.2196/39890

PMID: 36416885

PMCID: 9730211

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Factors Influencing Older Adults’ Decisions Surrounding Adoption of Technology:An Experimental Study

  • Jerad Moxley; 
  • Joseph Sharit; 
  • Sara J Czaja

ABSTRACT

Background:

The rapid diffusion of technology applications may support older adult independence and improve the quality of their lives. Models for predicting older adult technology acceptance are sparse, based on broad questions related to general technology acceptance, and largely not grounded in theories of aging

Objective:

This study uses a mixed-method approach involving five technologies to comprehensively assess the causal relationships among factors that influence older adults’ willingness to adopt the technologies.

Methods:

One hundred and eighty-seven male and female adults 65-92 years of age participated in the study. Participants were given presentations on five different technologies spanning domains that included transportation, leisure, health, and new learning, and provided ratings of each technology on various measures hypothesized to influence adoption. They were also administered other instruments to collect data on their actual and self-assessed cognitive abilities, rates of discounting of the technologies with respect to willingness to invest time to attain higher skills on the technologies, general technology experience, and attitudes toward technology. We used the machine-learning technique of k-fold cross-validated regressions to select variables that predicted participants’ willingness to adopt the technologies.

Results:

Willingness to adopt the technologies was most impacted by three variables: perceived value of the technologies, perceived improvement in quality of life attainable from the technologies, and confidence in being able to use the technologies. These variables, in turn, were mostly facilitated or inhibited by the perceived effort required to learn to use the technologies, a positive attitude toward technology as reflected in the optimism component of the technology readiness scale, degree to which technologies were discounted, and perceived help needed to learn to use the technologies.

Conclusions:

Our findings demonstrate that participants’ willingness to adopt technologies is mainly determined by three perceptions of the technologies, which mediated many relationships with willingness to adopt. We discuss the implications of these findings for the design and marketing of technology products for older consumers.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Moxley J, Sharit J, Czaja SJ

The Factors Influencing Older Adults’ Decisions Surrounding Adoption of Technology: Quantitative Experimental Study

JMIR Aging 2022;5(4):e39890

DOI: 10.2196/39890

PMID: 36416885

PMCID: 9730211

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.