Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 22, 2022
Date Accepted: Sep 28, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Text Topics and Treatment Response in Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Text Mining Study

Mylläri S, Saarni SE, Ritola V, Joffe G, Stenberg JH, Solbakken OA, Czajkowski NO, Rosenström T

Text Topics and Treatment Response in Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Text Mining Study

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(11):e38911

DOI: 10.2196/38911

PMID: 36350678

PMCID: 9685509

Text Topics and Treatment Response in Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Text Mining Study

  • Sanna Mylläri; 
  • Suoma Eeva Saarni; 
  • Ville Ritola; 
  • Grigori Joffe; 
  • Jan-Henry Stenberg; 
  • Ole André Solbakken; 
  • Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski; 
  • Tom Rosenström

ABSTRACT

Background:

Text mining methods, such as topic modeling, can offer valuable information on how and to whom internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapies (iCBT) work. Although iCBT treatments provide convenient data for topic modeling, it has rarely been used in this context.

Objective:

To apply topic modeling to written assignment texts from iCBT for generalized anxiety disorder and explore the resulting topics’ associations with treatment response. As predetermining the number of topics presents a considerable challenge in topic modeling, we also aimed to explore a novel method for topic number selection.

Methods:

We defined two latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic models using both a novel data-driven and a more commonly used interpretability-based topic number selection approach. We used multi-level models to associate the topics with continuous-valued treatment response, defined as the rate of per-session change in GAD-7 sum scores throughout the treatment.

Results:

Our analyses included 1686 patients. We observed two topics that were associated with better than average treatment response: “Well-being of family, pets and loved ones” from the data-driven LDA model (B = ˗0.10 sd/session/∆topic; 95% CI ˗016 – ˗0.03) and “Children, family issues” from the interpretability-based model (B = ˗0.18 sd/session/∆θ; 95% CI ˗0.31 – ˗0.05). Two topics were associated with worse treatment response: “Monitoring of thoughts and worries” from the data-driven model (B = 0.06 sd/session/∆θ; 95% CI 0.01 – 0.11) and “Internet therapy” from the interpretability-based model (B = 0.27 sd/session/∆θ; 95% CI 0.07 – 0.46).

Conclusions:

The two LDA models were different in terms of their interpretability and broadness of topics, but both contained topics that were associated with treatment response in a meaningful manner. Our work demonstrates that topic modeling suits well for iCBT research and has potential to expose clinically relevant information from vast text data.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Mylläri S, Saarni SE, Ritola V, Joffe G, Stenberg JH, Solbakken OA, Czajkowski NO, Rosenström T

Text Topics and Treatment Response in Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Text Mining Study

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(11):e38911

DOI: 10.2196/38911

PMID: 36350678

PMCID: 9685509

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.