Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Diabetes

Date Submitted: Apr 13, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 11, 2022 - Sep 11, 2022
Date Accepted: Oct 15, 2022
Date Submitted to PubMed: Oct 20, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Modified e-Delphi Process for the Selection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Children and Families With Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitors: Delphi Study

Shah P, Raymond JK, Espinoza J

Modified e-Delphi Process for the Selection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Children and Families With Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitors: Delphi Study

JMIR Diabetes 2022;7(4):e38660

DOI: 10.2196/38660

PMID: 36265838

PMCID: 9752458

Modified E-Delphi Process for Selection of Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Children and Families with Type-1 Diabetes using Continuous Glucose Monitors

  • Payal Shah; 
  • Jennifer K. Raymond; 
  • Juan Espinoza

ABSTRACT

Background:

Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) management is complex and associated with significant psychosocial burden. Continuous glucose monitors (CGM) can improve disease management and outcomes, but also introduce new or exacerbate existing psychosocial concerns. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) can be used to capture this information, but there is no consensus on which PROMs should be used in pediatric CGM research.

Objective:

We describe out the process to: 1) identify PROMs that could be used to assess the impact of CGMs on pediatric patients with T1D, 2) implement a modified e-Delphi methodology to arrive at an expert consensus on which PROMs are most suitable for clinical and research applications, and 3) establish a periodicity table for the administration of PROMs over time in Real-World Evidence study.

Methods:

In order to identify appropriate PROMs for pediatric patients and families with T1D and CGMs, we conducted an asynchronous, electronic Delphi (e-Delphi) process with a multidisciplinary group of experts from around the country. We identified candidate instruments through a literature review. The three-round e-Delphi process was conducted via a study website, email, and online forms. Participants provided opinions on usefulness of instruments, age validation, feasibility, time, and frequency of administration.

Results:

Sixteen experts participated in the E-Delphi process; four of them consistently in all three rounds. We identified 62 candidate instruments, which were narrowed down to 12 final PROMs across five domains: Diabetes Distress and Burden (4 instruments), Autonomy (2 instruments), Quality of Life (1 instrument), Psychosocial (3 instruments) and Technology Acceptance (2 instruments). A quarterly administration schedule was developed to reduce burden on participants.

Conclusions:

PROMs can provide critical insights into the psychosocial well-being of patients. The specific measures identified in the paper are particularly well suited for pediatric patients with T1D and CGMs. Clinical implementation could help healthcare providers, patients and families engage in more comprehensive disease management.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Shah P, Raymond JK, Espinoza J

Modified e-Delphi Process for the Selection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Children and Families With Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitors: Delphi Study

JMIR Diabetes 2022;7(4):e38660

DOI: 10.2196/38660

PMID: 36265838

PMCID: 9752458

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.