Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Apr 10, 2022
Date Accepted: Jan 19, 2023

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Adaptation and Utilization of a Postmarket Evaluation Model for Digital Contact Tracing Mobile Health Tools in the United States: Observational Cross-sectional Study

Cevasco KE, Roess AA

Adaptation and Utilization of a Postmarket Evaluation Model for Digital Contact Tracing Mobile Health Tools in the United States: Observational Cross-sectional Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e38633

DOI: 10.2196/38633

PMID: 36947135

PMCID: 10036112

Adaptation and use of a postmarket evaluation model for digital contact tracing mHealth tools using United States observational data: Cross Sectional Study

  • Kevin Edward Cevasco; 
  • Amira A Roess

ABSTRACT

Background:

During periods of high COVID-19 incidence, United States (U.S.) health departments were unable to scale up case management staff to deliver effective and timely contact tracing services. New digital contact tracing (DCT) interventions were deployed quickly during the pandemic without an opportunity to conduct experiments to determine effectiveness.

Objective:

To evaluate the effectiveness of COVID-19 DCT applications deployed in the U.S. during the COVID-19 pandemic. Case investigation and contact tracing are core public health tools used to interrupt disease transmission, but it is unclear whether current DCT applications can effectively supplement understaffed manual contact tracers.

Methods:

There are no clearly established assessment methods for public health applications offered by the US National Library of Medicine (NLM) National Information Center on Health Services Research and Health Care Technology (NICHSR), nor the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Therefore, we evaluated COVID-19 digital contact tracing applications by adapting the American Psychological Association (APA) App Evaluation Model (AEM) framework. We used data from a nationally representative survey of COVID-19 related behaviors and experiences. A minimum critical mass measure is threshold is used to assess population effectiveness (56%). Logistic regression analyzed characteristics of segments adopting and interested in DCT applications.

Results:

A total of 17.4% (n=490) of the study population reported adopting a DCT application, 24.7% (n=697) reported interest, and 58.0% (n=1637) were not interested. Younger, high income, and uninsured individuals were more likely to adopt a DCT application. In contrast, people in fair to poor health were interested in DCT applications but did not adopt them. Application adoption was positively associated with visiting friends and family outside the home (OR 1.63 95%CI 1.28-2.09), not wearing masks (OR 0.52 95% CI 0.38-0.71), and adopters thinking they have or had COVID-19 (OR 1.60 95% CI 1.21-2.12).

Conclusions:

Overall, a small segment of the population adopted DCT applications. These applications may not be effective in protecting adopter’s friends and family from their maskless contacts outside the home given low adoption rates and DCT technology false negative detection issues. Public health community should account for user behavioral factors in application design.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Cevasco KE, Roess AA

Adaptation and Utilization of a Postmarket Evaluation Model for Digital Contact Tracing Mobile Health Tools in the United States: Observational Cross-sectional Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e38633

DOI: 10.2196/38633

PMID: 36947135

PMCID: 10036112

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.