Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Date Submitted: Mar 17, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 17, 2022 - Mar 25, 2022
Date Accepted: May 10, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Comparison of Accelerometry-based Measures of Physical Activity: Observational Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Given the evolution of processing and analyzing accelerometry data over the past decade, it is of utmost importance that we as a field understand how newer (e.g., MIMS) summary measures compare to long-established ones (e.g., ActiGraph activity counts).
Objective:
Our study aims to compare and harmonize accelerometry-based measures of physical activity (PA) to increase the comparability, generalizability, and translation of findings across studies using objective measures of PA.
Methods:
High resolution accelerometry data were collected from 655 participants in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study on Aging who wore an ActiGraph GT9X device at wrist continuously for a week. Data were summarized at the minute-level as activity counts (AC; measure obtained from ActiGraph's ActiLife software) and MIMS, ENMO, MAD, and AI (open-source measures implemented in R). The correlation between AC and other measures was quantified both marginally and conditionally on age, sex and BMI. Next, each pair of measures were harmonized using nonparametric regression of minute-level measurements.
Results:
The study sample had the following characteristics: mean (sd) age of 69.8 (14.2), BMI of 27.3 (5.0) kg/m², 54.5% females, and 67.9% white. The marginal participant-specific correlation between AC and MIMS, ENMO, MAD, and AI were 0.988, 0.867, 0.913 and 0.970, respectively. After harmonization, the mean absolute percentage error for predicting total AC from MIMS, ENMO, MAD, and AI was 2.5, 14.3, 11.3 and 6.3, respectively. The accuracy for predicting sedentary minutes based on AC (AC > 1853) using MIMS, ENMO, MAD and AI was 0.981, 0.928, 0.904, and 0.960, respectively. An R software with a unified interface for computation of the open-source measures from raw accelerometry data was developed and published as SummarizedActigraphy R package.
Conclusions:
Our comparison of accelerometry-based measures of PA enables researchers to extend the knowledge from the thousands of manuscripts that have been published using ActiGraph AC to MIMS and other measures by demonstrating their high correlation and providing a harmonization mapping.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.